Abstract:Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an autoimmune disorder caused by antibodies against platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin complexes. Rapid immunoassays (IAs) for detection of these antibodies mark a milestone in HIT diagnosis, despite a higher false-positive rate compared with functional platelet-activation assays. However, combining different rapid IAs may help to improve their diagnostic specificity. Here, we compared the individual performance of the latex immunoturbidimetric assay (LIA; HemosIL HIT-Ab [PF4-H]; sensitivity 91.7%, specificity 68.4%) and chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA; HemosIL AcuStarHIT-Ab [PF4-H]; sensitivity 92.4%, specificity 85.8%) with their combined performance using two unique diagnostic algorithms in a single prospective cohort of suspected HIT patients. Using the simultaneous algorithm adapted from Warkentin et al, the combined LIA–CLIA had a sensitivity of 99.0% and specificity of 64.3%. The sequential algorithm adapted from Rittener-Ruff et al was applied in two theoretical scenarios to reflect real-world circumstances in diagnostic laboratories where access to clinical information is limited: (1) assuming all patients had an intermediate 4Ts score and (2) assuming all patients had a high 4Ts score. This algorithm correctly predicted HIT in 94.5% (high 4Ts) and 96.0% (intermediate 4Ts) and excluded HIT in 82.6% (high 4Ts) and 80.1% (intermediate 4Ts) of patients in either scenario, respectively. Although both combined algorithms improved diagnostic performance of individual IAs, the simultaneous algorithm showed fewer false predictions (7.9%) than the sequential algorithm (intermediate 4Ts: 37.6% and high 4Ts: 41.5%) and proved more practical as it does not rely on physician evaluations. Our findings highlight the importance of accounting for clinician and interlaboratory variability when evaluating diagnostic tests for HIT. A.B. and Y.Z. analyzed and interpreted the data, performed statistical analysis, and wrote the manuscript. M.C. performed statistical analysis and wrote the manuscript. J.C.M collected patient samples, performed experiments, and provided technical assistance. T.E.W. and D.M.A. interpreted data and wrote the manuscript. I.N. designed the research, analyzed and interpreted data, and wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript. Article published online: 11 May 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

Accuracy of Diagnosing Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Diagnosing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: The need for accuracy and speed

Evaluating Diagnostic Algorithms for Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia using Two Combined Automated Rapid Immunoassays

Rapid and accurate Bayesian diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Proteomic profiling for biomarker discovery in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Evaluating heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: the old and the new

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: A Comprehensive Clinical Review

False-Negative Platelet Factor 4 Antibodies and Serotonin Release Assay and the Utility of Repeat Testing in the Diagnosis of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis

Combination of 2 Quantitative Immunoassays and Clinical Score Algorithm to Reduce False-Negative Results in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: Prevalence Study of Mauriziano Hospital in Turin, Italy

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: An international assessment of the quality of laboratory testing

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment

High sensitivity and specificity of a new functional flow cytometry assay for clinically significant heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in Patients Suffering Cardiogenic Shock

Accuracy of the functional, flow cytometer-based Emo-Test HIT Confirm® for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Absolute Immature Platelet Counts in the Setting of Suspected Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia May Predict Anti-Pf4-heparin Immunoassay Testing Results

Comparison between different laboratory tests for the detection and prevention of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Evaluation of a flow cytometer-based functional assay using platelet-rich plasma in the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Laboratory tests for identification or exclusion of heparin induced thrombocytopenia: HIT or miss?

Clinical and economic implications of false-positive heparin-induced thrombocytopenia immunoassays: utility of the 4T score

Is the combination of two automated rapid assays for diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia necessary?

Comparative effectiveness and safety of anticoagulants for the treatment of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia