Antagonistic and additive effect when combining biopesticides against the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda

Steven J. Harte,Daniel P. Bray,Victoria Nash-Woolley,Philip C. Stevenson,G. Mandela Fernández-Grandon
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56599-w
IF: 4.6
2024-03-12
Scientific Reports
Abstract:Abstract Fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (FAW) is a cosmopolitan crop pest species that has recently become established in sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia. Current FAW control is almost entirely dependent on synthetic pesticides. Biopesticides offer a more sustainable alternative but have limitations. For example, pyrethrum is an effective botanical insecticide with low mammalian toxicity but is highly UV labile, resulting in a rapid loss of efficacy in the field. Beauveria bassiana is an entomopathogenic fungus that is more persistent, but there is a time lag of several days before it causes insect mortality and leads to effective control. The combination of these biopesticides could mitigate their drawbacks for FAW control. Here we evaluated the efficacy of pyrethrum and B. bassiana as individual treatments and in combination against 3 rd instar FAW. Four different combinations of these two biopesticides were tested, resulting in an antagonistic relationship at the lowest concentrations of B. bassiana and pyrethrum (1 × 10 4 conidia mL −1 with 25 ppm) and an additive effect for the other 3 combined treatments (1 × 10 4 conidia mL −1 with 100 ppm and 1 × 10 5 conidia mL −1 with 25 ppm and 100 ppm pyrethrum). Additionally, a delay in efficacy from B. bassiana was observed when combined with pyrethrum as well as a general inhibition of growth on agar plates. These results appear to show that this particular combination of biopesticides is not universally beneficial or detrimental to pest control strategies and is dependent on the doses of each biopesticide applied. However, the additive effect shown here at specific concentrations does indicate that combining biopesticides could help overcome the challenges of persistence seen in botanical pesticides and the slow establishment of EPF, with the potential to improve effectiveness of biopesticides for IPM.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore the effect of biopesticides in controlling Spodoptera frugiperda (FAW), especially when these biopesticides are used in combination. Specifically, the study focuses on the insecticidal effect of the combined use of two biopesticides - pyrethrum and Beauveria bassiana - on FAW. ### Research Background Spodoptera frugiperda is a global crop pest and has spread rapidly in sub - Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia in recent years. Currently, synthetic pesticides are mainly relied on to control FAW, but this method has problems such as great environmental impact and easy to develop resistance. Therefore, finding more sustainable alternatives has become an urgent problem to be solved. Biopesticides, as an environmentally - friendly option, although have potential, also have some limitations: - **Pyrethrum**: This is a plant - derived insecticide, with low toxicity to mammals, but sensitive to ultraviolet light and degrades quickly in the field environment. - **Beauveria bassiana**: This is an entomopathogenic fungus, with good persistence, but a long - acting time, usually taking several days to cause insect death. ### Research Purposes This study aims to evaluate the insecticidal effects of pyrethrum and Beauveria bassiana used alone and in combination on the 3 - instar FAW larvae, and to explore the synergistic or antagonistic effects under different concentration combinations. Specific objectives include: 1. **Evaluating the effect of single treatment**: Test the insecticidal effects of pyrethrum and Beauveria bassiana on FAW respectively, and determine their respective median lethal doses (LD50). 2. **Evaluating the effect of combined treatment**: Through combined treatments with different concentrations, evaluate their insecticidal effects on FAW, and analyze whether there are synergistic, additive or antagonistic effects. 3. **Exploring the mechanism**: Through in vitro experiments, evaluate the growth of Beauveria bassiana under different concentrations of pyrethrum, and explore the possible mechanism of action. ### Main Findings The study shows that: - At the lowest concentrations (1 × 10^4 conidia mL^(-1) and 25 ppm), the combination of pyrethrum and Beauveria bassiana shows an antagonistic effect. - In the other three combined treatments (1 × 10^4 conidia mL^(-1)+ 100 ppm, 1 × 10^5 conidia mL^(-1)+ 25 ppm and 1 × 10^5 conidia mL^(-1)+ 100 ppm), an additive effect is shown. - The growth of Beauveria bassiana is inhibited in a high - concentration pyrethrum environment, which may be one of the reasons for the antagonistic effect. ### Conclusions This study shows that the combined use of pyrethrum and Beauveria bassiana is not always beneficial or harmful, but depends on their specific concentrations. The additive effect at specific concentrations indicates that a reasonable combination of biopesticides can overcome the limitations of single use and improve the application effect of biopesticides in integrated pest management (IPM). ### Formula Summary - **Schneider - Orelli’s formula** is used to correct the mortality rate of the control group: \[ \text{Corrected mortality rate}=\frac{\text{Observed mortality rate}-\text{Control group mortality rate}}{1 - \text{Control group mortality rate}} \] - **Expected mortality rate calculation formula**: \[ E = 1-((1 - A)\times(1 - B)) \] where \(A\) and \(B\) are the corrected single - treatment mortality rates respectively. - **Chi - square test formula**: \[ \chi^2=\frac{(M_o - M_e)^2}{M_e} \] where \(M_o\) is the observed corrected mortality rate and \(M_e\) is the expected corrected mortality rate. Through these formulas, researchers can accurately evaluate the differences between different treatments and determine whether there are synergistic, additive or antagonistic effects.