Abstract:Background: The mislabeling of seafood, wherein a food product's marketed name does not match its contents, has the potential to mask species of conservation concern. Less discussed is the role of legally ambiguous market names, wherein a single name could be used to sell multiple species. Here we report the first study in Canada to examine mislabeling and ambiguous market names in both invertebrate (e.g., bivalve, cephalopod, shrimp) and finfish products. Methods: A total of 109 invertebrate and 347 finfish products were sampled in Calgary between 2014 and 2020. Market names were documented from the label or equivalent and determined to be precise (the name could apply to only one species) or ambiguous (multiple species could be sold under that name). A region of the cytochrome c oxidase I gene was sequenced and compared to reference sequences from boldsystems.org. Samples were considered mislabeled if the species identified through DNA barcoding did not correspond to the market name, as determined through the Canadian Food Inspection Agency Fish List. Mislabeling was further differentiated between semantic mislabeling, wherein the market name was not found on the Fish List but the barcode identity was in line with what a consumer could reasonably have expected to have purchased; invalid market names, wherein the market name was so unusual that no legitimate inferences as to the product's identity could be made; and product substitution, wherein the DNA barcode identified the product as a species distinct from that associated with the market name. Invalid market names and product substitutions were used to provide conservative estimates of mislabeling. The global conservation status of the DNA-identified invertebrate or finfish was determined through the International Union for the Conservation of Nature Red List. A logistic regression was used to determine the relationship between precision and accuracy in predicting conservation status of the sampled species. Results: There was no significant difference in mislabeling occurrence between invertebrates (33.9% total mislabeling occurrence, 20.2% product substitution) and finfish (32.3% total mislabeling occurrence, 21.3% product substitution/invalid market names). Product substitutions sometimes involved species of conservation concern, such as foods marketed as freshwater eel (Anguilla rostrata) that were determined through DNA barcoding to be European eel (Anguilla anguilla), or cuttlefish balls putatively identified as the Endangered threadfin porgy (Evynnis cardinalis). Product substitutions and ambiguous market names were significantly associated with the sale of species of conservation concern, but ambiguity was a more important predictor. Although preventing the mislabeling of seafoods can and must remain a priority in Canada, our work suggests that moving towards precise names for all seafood products will better support sustainable fisheries goals.

High levels of mislabelling of shark flesh in Australian fish markets and seafood shops

Could do better! A high school market survey of fish labelling in Sydney, Australia, using DNA barcodes

Mislabeled and ambiguous market names in invertebrate and finfish seafood conceal species of conservation concern in Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Using DNA Barcoding to Investigate Patterns of Species Utilisation in UK Shark Products Reveals Threatened Species on Sale

Mislabelled frozen fish fillets in the Klang Valley in Malaysia and its potential impact on consumers

Genetic identification of three CITES-listed sharks using a paper-based Lab-on-a-Chip (LOC)

DNA barcoding revealed a high percentage of mislabeling in commercial fish products: the first empirical survey in South Texas

DNA Barcoding Identifies Endangered Sharks in Pet Food Sold in Singapore

Mismanagement and poor transparency in the European processed seafood supply revealed by DNA metabarcoding

Fish mislabelling in France: substitution rates and retail types

‘Genome skimming’ with the MinION hand-held sequencer identifies CITES-listed shark species in India’s exports market

DNA barcoding unveils a high rate of mislabeling in a commercial freshwater catfish from Brazil

DNA analysis of elasmobranch products originating from Bangladesh reveals unregulated elasmobranch fishery and trade on species of global conservation concern

Bioinformatics Approach to Mitigate Mislabeling in EU Seafood Market and Protect Consumer Health

Secondary predation constrains DNA-based diet reconstruction in two threatened shark species

DNA barcoding continues to identify endangered species of shark sold as food in a globally significant shark fin trade hub

Molecular analyses of confiscated shark fins reveal shortcomings of CITES implementations in Germany

DNA barcoding reveals global and local influences on patterns of mislabeling and substitution in the trade of fish in Mexico

Multiplex real-time PCR assay to detect illegal trade of CITES-listed shark species

Use of DNA Barcoding to Identify Species of Raw Ready‐To‐Eat Seafood Products Sold in Orange County, CA

The Species and Origin of Shark Fins in Taiwan’s Fishing Ports, Markets, and Customs Detention: A DNA Barcoding Analysis