Beech, A. N., Haworth, S., & Knepil, G. J. (2017). Measurement of generic compared with disease-specific quality of life after removal of mandibular third molars: a patient-centred evaluation. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 274-280. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2017.01.005

Abstract:PURPOSE: To evaluate the responsiveness and patient perceptions of a generic quality of life (QoL) tool following surgical removal of mandibular third molar teeth (M3M). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 40 consecutive patients who met NICE guidelines for M3M removal were invited to rank items from the generic EQ5D3L and the disease specific OHIP14 QoL tools, based on the perceived material significance of the item to the patient. The items were then assigned a numerical value dependent upon their rank and an overall score was calculated for each item. 50 consecutive patients were then invited to complete a paper based EQ5D3L QoL questionnaire, daily, for 7 days following M3M removal, returning the questionnaire in a prepaid postal envelope. Inclusion criteria were; American Association of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) Class I or II, aged 18 to 25, non-smoker, requiring surgical M3M extraction as defined by the NICE guidelines, and the procedure undertaken as an ambulatory day case procedure under general anaesthesia. All patients were treated by the same surgeon in the day surgery unit of a large district general hospital. RESULTS: Most of the generic quality of life items ranked more highly than disease specific ones in terms of importance to the patients sampled. When used, the generic EQ5D3L questionnaire demonstrated a fall in QoL initially after M3M removal before improving for all participants over the subsequent 7 post-operative days. The responses to questions about “overall QoL”, “pain/discomfort” and “anxiety/depression” in the EQ5D5L tool were strongly correlated. CONCLUSIONS: The EQ5D3L is a responsive tool to assess fluctuations in QoL in the early postoperative period following removal of the M3M. EQ5D3L also describes items which are perceived to be more important to patients than the disease specific OHIP-14 QoL questionnaire, and are therefore more relevant when counselling patients preoperatively. Further development of QoL and patient reported outcome measure (PROM) tools when measuring early outcomes following M3M removal, should incorporate generic items to remain relevant for patient counselling.

Medicine