Abstract:We wish to thank McKinnon and colleagues for their interest in our article, their thoughtful comments and their shared concerns about the potential unintended consequences of removing intellectual disability and/or autism (ID/A) from Section 3 of the Mental Health Act (MHA) in England and Wales. We share their view that for people with ID/A where there are significant associated risks, they could be rendered vulnerable in the absence of Section 3 safeguards. Accurate clinical diagnosis of mental illness in people with ID/A frequently takes time, and the absence of such legislative safeguards may lead to such diagnoses being made in haste, potentially exposing patients to treatments that are less likely to be efficacious than with more time available to render a more well informed clinical diagnosis. As they suggest, the proposed changes could lead to a greater number of people with ID/A being imprisoned. Though prison can be a stressful environment for anyone, people with ID/A may experience a greater level of impact on their mental health and well-being for a variety of reasons, including both a lack of prison staff training and reasonable adjustments being made to the prison environment to support them. Reference McCarthy, Chaplin, Underwood, Forrester, Hayward and Sabet 1 Furthermore, as described by Allely and Wood Reference Allely and Wood 2 in the context of prisoners with autism, they are more vulnerable to bullying, social isolation, sexual victimisation and exploitation by other prisoners; it is reasonable to suspect that prisoners with intellectual disability may be similarly vulnerable. In comparison, in a hospital setting, such people would be supported by healthcare staff with specialist expertise in ID/A, in an environment better suited to the needs of people with either or both of these conditions. We agree with McKinnon and colleagues that autism and intellectual disability represent distinctly separate conditions that should be considered separately with respect to legislative change within the context of the MHA. They suggest that considering these conditions together indicates an ideological approach to the suggested changes. This is possible, but the conditions also have a historical association, with the first reported cases of people with autism having co-occurring delayed intellectual development. Reference Thurm, Farmer, Salzman, Lord and Bishop 3 Furthermore, autism is more prevalent among people with intellectual disability than their peers without intellectual disability, Reference Brugha, Spiers, Bankart, Cooper, McManus and Scott 4 though it is important to recognise that people with autism exist across all levels of intellectual functioning, from those with co-occurring profound intellectual disability to highly intelligent individuals. We share the view expressed by McKinnon and colleagues that these two conditions should not be conflated, and instead be treated as separate diagnostic entities. It is important that the evidence pertaining to the proposed changes for both conditions are considered independently of one another.

Who is at risk? Adults with intellectual disability at risk of admission to mental health inpatient care

Risk rates and profiles at intake in child and adolescent mental health services: A cohort and latent class analyses of 21,688 young people in South London

Predicting patients with dementia most at risk of needing psychiatric in-patient or enhanced community care using routinely collected clinical data: retrospective multi-site cohort study

Mental health needs of defendants with intellectual disabilities presenting at court

Severe and common mental disorders and risk of hospital admissions for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions (ACSCs): prospective cohort study using UK Biobank

The views of psychiatrists on proposed changes to the England and Wales Mental Health Act 1983 legislation for people with intellectual disability: A national study

Psychotic experiences and disorders in adolescents and young adults with intellectual disabilities: Evidence from a population-based birth cohort in the United Kingdom.

Impact of Crisis Care on Psychiatric Admission in Adults with Intellectual Disability and Mental Illness And/Or Challenging Behavior: A Systematic Review

A Qualitative Analysis of Contributory Factors to Serious Incidents Involving Adults With Learning Disabilities Receiving NHS Mental Healthcare

Severe and common mental disorders and risk of emergency hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions among the UK Biobank cohort

Change in risk status of psychiatric patients admitted to Crisis and Home Treatment Team: an evaluation in the UK

The potential unintended consequences of Mental Health Act reforms in England and Wales on people with intellectual disability and/or autism: commentary, author response, Tromans et al

Admissions to paediatric medical wards with a primary mental health diagnosis: a systematic review of the literature

Risks of covid-19 hospital admission and death for people with learning disability: population based cohort study using the OpenSAFELY platform

'Far Away from Home': adolescent inpatient admissions far from home, out of area or to adult wards: a national surveillance study

Prevalence estimates of mental health problems in children and adolescents with intellectual disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Intellectual disability and mental illness in the NSW criminal justice system

Hospital admissions of school‐age children with an intellectual disability: A population survey

Understanding the current provisions of support for people with an intellectual disabilities and/or autism in crisis: A mixed methods study

Short Report: Exploring the extent to which Intellectual Disability is undiagnosed within children attending developmental paediatric clinics

Adolescent Inpatient Mental Health Admissions: An Exploration of Interpersonal Polyvictimization, Family Dysfunction, Self-Harm and Suicidal Behaviours