Describing High School Stakeholders' Preferences for a Return‐to‐School Framework Following Concussion

Heather A. Shepherd,Emily Heming,Nick Reed,Jeffrey G. Caron,Keith O. Yeates,Carolyn A. Emery
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.13434
2024-01-25
Journal of School Health
Abstract:BackgroundReturn to school supports are recommended to facilitate adolescents' re‐entry to school following a concussion. However, little is known as to what school stakeholders prefer for a return‐to‐school process. This study sought to describe the preferences of high school students, parents, and educators for a Return‐to‐School Framework for adolescents following a concussion. MethodsWe conducted qualitative semi‐structured, 1‐on‐1 or group interviews with high school students (n = 6), parents (n = 5), and educators (n = 15) from Calgary, Canada. Interviews aimed to describe participants' preferences for a Return‐to‐School Framework for students following a concussion. Interviews were analyzed using conventional content analysis. ResultsWe organized the data into 4 main themes: (1) purpose of the Return‐to‐School Framework; (2) format and operation of the Return‐to‐School Framework; (3) communication about a student's concussion; and (4) necessity of concussion education for students and educators. Implications for School Health Policy, Practice, and EquityA Return‐to‐School Framework following concussion should be developed in consultation with families, educators, and students and supports should be tailored to each student. ConclusionsParticipants preferred a standardized and consistent Return‐to‐School Framework including ongoing communication between stakeholders as well as feasible and individualized school supports.
public, environmental & occupational health,health care sciences & services,education & educational research,education, scientific disciplines
What problem does this paper attempt to address?