Abstract:Introduction: The elderly population is rapidly increasing, and with cancer, particularly breast cancer, being most prevalent in this group, its management is becoming increasingly important. A major aspect of breast cancer treatment and subsequent quality of life is the opportunity for reconstructive surgery post-mastectomy. This is particularly important as survival rates are improving, so a larger proportion of patients are living with the long term consequences of their treatment. Evidence has shown that age itself is not a risk factor for poor surgical outcomes, but concern over this causes surgeons to be wary of offering elderly patients the opportunity of reconstruction. Elderly patients themselves are also less likely to request or accept reconstruction. Methods: Literature searches using keywords 'breast reconstruction', 'older' and 'elderly' were carried out on Pubmed, Scopus and Google Scholar. Results were limited to English language, and then manually searched to exclude irrelevant articles. Duplicates were removed and a series of articles were reviewed. Results: Surgery was well tolerated in elderly patients, with complication rates comparable to a younger group. Autogenous tissue produced better outcomes than implant reconstruction. In areas such as social functioning and emotional wellbeing, patients with reconstructive surgery showed better outcomes than those without. Discussion: The research on this topic is limited and only available in the form of case series. Direct comparison between these series cannot be drawn. The available series lack a clear assessment of the patient's frailty and do not define which patients should be offered breast reconstruction and which ones should be denied. Despite this, the evidence strongly suggests that it would be beneficial to offer elderly patients reconstructive surgery, dependent on their individual risk. A careful pre-operative assessment allows selecting the appropriate candidate on the basis of fitness, particularly when long and complex reconstructive procedures involving microvascular transfer such as DIEP or free TRAM flaps are considered. Reasons why patients decide to decline breast reconstruction may have altered more recently with wider media coverage and information especially on the internet. There are also real issues with availability of highly trained surgical teams capable of performing microsurgical transfer procedures, theatre availability and constraints due the present economic recession. Thus, there are multiple factors that influence breast reconstruction and patients, even in different parts of a single country, may have variations in the algorithm of options offered for breast reconstruction.

Expanded Indications for Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction in Patients Older Than 60 Years

Nipple-Sparing Mastectomies in Patients over the Age of 60 Years: Factors Associated with Surgical Outcomes

Clinical outcomes of patients after nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction based on the expander/implant technique

Nipple-sparing mastectomy: initial experience at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and a comprehensive review of literature

Immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction in nipple sparing mastectomy with Wise-pattern incision in large and ptotic breasts: our experience and short-term results.

Periareolar Skin-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Implant-Based Reconstruction: A Reappraisal

[A Retrospective Study of 129 Cases with Immediate Breast Reconstruction after Skin-Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer].

Nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implants in early breast cancer

Skin Sparing Mastectomy with Preservation of Nipple Areola Complex and Immediate Breast Reconstruction in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Single Centre Prospective Study

Immediate Prepectoral Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction Without Acellular Dermal Matrix Is Equally Safe Following Skin-Sparing and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy

Can Skin Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Submuscular Implant-Based Reconstruction Be a Better Choice in Treatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer?

Endoscopic-assisted Nipple-sparing Mastectomy with Direct-to-Implant Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction in the Management of Breast Cancer

Oncoplastic Surgery Outcomes in the Older Breast Cancer Population: A Matched-Cohort Comparison Study

Nipple-sparing Mastectomy in Breast Cancer: From an Oncologic Safety Perspective

Staged breast reconstruction utilizing primary nipple repositioning surgery prior to nipple-sparing mastectomy

Breast reconstruction in elderly women breast cancer: a review

Breast reconstruction in older patients: A literature review of the decision-making process

Oncoplastic Breast Consortium consensus conference on nipple-sparing mastectomy

Oncologic Outcomes of Immediate Breast Reconstruction in the Setting of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Long-term Follow-up Study of a Matched Cohort

Safety and Feasibility of Minimally Invasive (Laparoscopic/Robotic-Assisted) Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Combined with Prosthesis Breast Reconstruction in Breast Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Oncologic Outcomes of Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Reconstruction After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer