The function of the Leuconostoc citrovorum factor in cell division and the inactivation of aminopterin
W. Jacobson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005074
1954-03-29
Journal of Physiology
Abstract:As previously recorded (Jacobson, 1954), folic acid antagonists such as aminopterin and A-methopterin arrest mitosis in metaphase; it was also found that certain types of cells are able to overcome this inhibition on more prolonged exposure to the agents. The present study was undertaken with two main objects, (a) to find whether the inhibition of mitosis by the folic acid antagonists is of an unspecific nature or whether it is due to interference with the normal function of a particular substance within the cell; and (b) to discover why certain tissues gradually become 'resistant' to the antagonists. The results showed that the agents probably interfere with the intracellular activity, not of folic acid itself, but of one of its derivatives, viz. the Leuconostoc citrovorum factor (LCF) a 5-formyl, 5: 6: 7: 8-tetrahydro derivative of folic acid. That some tissues gradually become resistant to folic acid antagonists might have been due to either of two alternatives: (1) the cells might use another metabolic pathway, by-passing the block caused by the antagonist and rendering the action of LCF no longer essential for cell division; or (2) the cells might inactivate the inhibitor. As described below, the latter alternative was found to be correct. Structural formulae of the pteridine compounds used in this work are shown in Fig. 1 of the previous paper (Jacobson, 1954). The L. citrovorum factor was discovered by Sauberlich & Bauman in 1948; it was shown to be a derivative of folic acid and was synthesized in 1950 by two groups of workers, Brockman, Roth, Broquist, Hultquist, Smith, Fahrenbach, Cosulich, Parker, Stockstad & Jukes (1950) and Shive, Bardos, Bond & Rogers (1950). Its structure has been established by Flynn, Bond, Bardos & Shive (1951); Pohland, Flynn, Jones & Shive (1951); Roth, Hultquist, Fahrenbach, Cosulich, Broquist, Brockman, Smith, Parker, Stockstad & Jukes (1952); and Cosulich, Roth, Smith Hultquist & Parker (1952). Cosulich,