Soil gross N2O emission and uptake under two contrasting agroforestry systems: riparian tree buffer versus alley-cropping tree row

Jie Luo,Lukas Beule,Guodong Shao,Dan Niu,Edzo Veldkamp,Marife D. Corre
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-024-01141-3
IF: 4.812
2024-05-18
Biogeochemistry
Abstract:In addition to the removal of excess mineral nitrogen (N) via root uptake, trees in agroforestry systems may mitigate negative effects of high N fertilization of adjacent crops by enhancing complete denitrification of excess mineral N aside from root uptake. Presently, little is known about the potential for NO 3 − reduction through denitrification (conversion to greenhouse gas N 2 O and subsequently to non-reactive N 2 ) in contrasting agroforestry systems: riparian tree buffer versus tree row of an upland alley-cropping system. Our study aimed to (1) quantify gross N 2 O emissions (both N 2 O + N 2 emissions) and gross N 2 O uptake (N 2 O reduction to N 2 ), and (2) determine their controlling factors. We employed the 15 N 2 O pool dilution technique to quantify gross N 2 O fluxes from 0 to 5 cm (topsoil) and 40 to 60 cm (subsoil) depths with seasonal field measurements in 2019. The riparian tree buffer exhibited higher topsoil gross N 2 O emissions and uptake than the alley-cropping tree row ( P < 0.03). Gross N 2 O emissions were regulated by N and carbon (C) availabilities and aeration status rather than denitrification gene abundance. Gross N 2 O uptake was directly linked to available C and nirK gene abundance. In the subsoil, gross N 2 O emission and uptake were low in both agroforestry systems, resulting from low mineral N contents possibly due to N uptake by deep tree roots. Nonetheless, the larger available C and soil moisture in the subsoil of riparian tree buffer than in alley-cropping tree row ( P < 0.05) suggest its large potential for N 2 O uptake whenever NO 3 − is transported to the subsoil.
environmental sciences,geosciences, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?