Abstract:<h3 class="Heading">Background</h3><p class="Para">Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has become first-line treatment for patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO). Delay in the interhospital transfer (IHT) of patients from referral hospitals to a comprehensive stroke center is associated with worse outcomes. At our academic tertiary care facility in an urban setting, a neurocritical care and emergency neurology unit (NCCU) receives patients with AIS-LVO from outlying medical facilities. When the NCCU is full, patients with AIS-LVO are initially transferred to a critical care resuscitation unit (CCRU). We were interested in quantifying the numbers of AIS-LVO patients treated in those two units and assessing their outcomes. We hypothesized that the CCRU would facilitate an increase in IHTs and provide care comparable to that delivered by the subspecialty NCCU.</p><h3 class="Heading">Methods</h3><p class="Para">We conducted a retrospective study of the medical center's prospective stroke registry for adult IHT patients undergoing MT between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2017. Primary outcome was time from consultation and request for transfer to arrival (Consult-Arrival). Other outcomes of interest were functional independence, defined as 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤ 2, and 90-day all-cause mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess association between clinical factors, mortality, and functional independence.</p><h3 class="Heading">Results</h3><p class="Para">We analyzed the records of 128 IHT patients: 87 (68%) were admitted to the CCRU, and 41 (32%) to the NCCU. The two groups had similar baseline characteristics (age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography scores [ASPECTS]). The median Consult-Arrival time was shorter for CCRU patients than for the NCCU patients (86 [88‒109] vs 100 [77‒127] [<em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">p </em>= 0.031]). The 90-day mortality rates (16 vs 30% [<em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">p </em>= 0.052]) and the rates having a mRS score ≤ 2 (31 vs 36% [<em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">p </em>= 0.59]) were not statistically different. Multivariable logistic regression showed that each minute of delay in the Consult-Arrival time was associated with 2.3% increase in the likelihood of death (OR 1.023; 95% CI 1.003‒1.04 [<em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">p </em>= 0.026]), while high thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score was the only factor that was significantly associated with functional independence at 90 days (OR 2.9; 95% CI 1.4‒6.4 [<em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">p</em> = 0.006]).</p><h3 class="Heading">Conclusion</h3><p class="Para">The CCRU increased AIS-LVO patients' access to definitive care and reduced their transfer time from outlying medical facilities while achieving outcomes similar to those attained by patients treated in the subspecialty NCCU. We conclude that a resuscitation unit can complement the NCCU to care for patients in the hyperacute phase of AIS-LVO.</p>

Abstract WP154: Factors Associated With Prolonged Length of Intensive Unit Stay Following Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Abstract WP153: Factors Affecting Length of ICU Stay After Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Large Vessel Ischemic Stroke

Abstract WP201: Post 90 Day Outcomes of Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Who Undergo Mechanical Thrombectomy: Analysis of Real-World Data

Abstract TP123: Impact of Hospital Procedure Volume of Mechanical Thrombectomy on Outcomes in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke in the United States

Abstract TP198: Factors Associated With Need for Decompressive Hemicraniectomy After Mechanical Thrombectomy in Stroke Patients

Abstract TP213: Predictors of Functional Independence Among Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Treated With Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis as Adjunct to Mechanical Thrombectomy

Abstract WP146: Critical Care After Thrombolytic Therapy in Acute Stroke: Who Really Needs the ICU?

An exploratory descriptive cohort study of 90-day prognosis after acute ischaemic stroke with mechanical thrombectomy

Characterization of length of stay after minimally invasive endoscopic intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation

National Trends and Outcomes of Hospital Presentation Mode for Endovascular Stroke Treatment in the U.S

Abstract TMP67: Predictors Of Unfavourable Events Despite Successful Mechanical Thrombectomy In The Extended Window

Evaluation of Post-thrombolytic Events to Determine Appropriate ICU Monitoring Duration for Patients with Ischemic Stroke

Outcomes of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Patients With Stroke Presenting With Low Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score in the Early and Extended Window

Clinical and Non-Clinical Determinants of the Effect of Mechanical Thrombectomy and Post-Stroke Functional Status of Patients in Short and Long-Term Follow-Up

Influence of Procedure Time on Outcome and Hemorrhagic Transformation in Stroke Patients Undergoing Thrombectomy

Assessment of Thrombectomy versus Combined Thrombolysis and Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke and Medium Vessel Occlusion

Abstract WP208: Infarction Size Affects Clinical Outcomes in Emergent Carotid Artery Stenting With Mechanical Thrombectomy

Comparison of Outcomes After Treatment of Large Vessel Occlusion in a Critical Care Resuscitation Unit or a Neurocritical Care Unit

Unfavorable neurological long-term outcome despite eTICI 3 - What are the predictors?

High mechanical thrombectomy procedural volume is not a reliable predictor of improved thrombectomy outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke in the United States

Abstract TP192: Combined Intra-Venous and Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis versus Intra-Venous Thrombolysis Alone in Stroke Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy for Large Vessel Occlusion: A Propensity-Matched Analysis