To be or not to be: The dilemma over the prognostic role of epilepsy at presentation in patients with glioblastoma – a systematic review and meta-analysis

Jessica Rossi,Francesco Cavallieri,Maria Chiara Bassi,Francesco Venturelli,Giulia Toschi,Giulia Di Rauso,Chiara Lucchi,Benedetta Donati,Romana Rizzi,Marco Russo,Massimo Bondavalli,Corrado Iaccarino,Giacomo Pavesi,Antonino Neri,Giuseppe Biagini,Alessia Ciarrocchi,Paolo Giorgi Rossi,Anna Pisanello,Franco Valzania
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13249-8
IF: 4.638
2024-12-05
BMC Cancer
Abstract:Despite some evidence of a possible link between epileptogenesis and tumorigenesis in glioblastoma, the prognostic value of epilepsy at presentation has been debated over the years. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize all published data evaluating the prognostic significance of seizures as a presenting manifestation of glioblastoma. A comprehensive search of five databases from inception to December 2023 was conducted. Included studies underwent meta-analysis, with subgroup analyses performed to identify sources of heterogeneity. Fifteen studies were included in the analysis. Seizures were considered a favorable prognostic factor in seven studies, while eight studies found no differences in overall survival between patients with seizures and those with other presenting symptoms. Eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled analysis indicated a potentially favorable prognostic impact of seizures at the clinical onset of glioblastoma (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.61–0.87). However, subgroup analysis within studies focusing on IDH-wild type cases showed no discernible impact from preoperative seizures. Retrospective design, poor quality in reporting results, and heterogeneity in tumor characteristics and therapies are the main limitations of included studies.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?