Abstract:While multisourcing offers benefits such as access to best-of-breed resources and enhanced competition, it also presents clients with a new governance challenge, namely the need to ensure that vendors not only deliver their individual contributions but also collaborate to produce a coherent joint outcome. Clients can address this challenge by combining bilateral governance focused on each vendor’s individual performance with collective governance aimed at the vendors’ joint performance. However, it is unclear how the simultaneous application of bilateral and collective governance affects multisourcing performance. Indeed, the literature falls short in systematically differentiating these governance mechanisms and empirically examining their interplay. Drawing on existing work on multisourcing and on the outsourcing governance literature, we argue that bilateral and collective governance direct efforts toward different performance dimensions (individual vs. joint), invoke different metaphors (market vs. team), and promote conflicting norms (competitive vs. cooperative), which can result in trade-offs when bilateral and collective governance mechanisms are combined. Results from a survey of 189 multisourcing arrangements support our expectation that bilateral and collective governance promote different performance dimensions. Notably, one collective governance mechanism, conflict management procedures, contributes to both individual and joint performance. We find substitutional effects between bilateral and collective governance in relation to joint performance but not individual performance, indicating that the benefits of collective governance for joint performance are more easily compromised than the benefits of bilateral governance for individual performance. We also observe complementary effects within collective governance mechanisms. Our key contribution lies in theorizing and empirically examining the effects and interplay of bilateral and collective governance in multisourcing.

Leveraging or Overcoming Distance? Global Strategy and Structure of Professional Services Firms

Mitigating Psychic Distance and Enhancing Internationalization of Fintech SMEs from Emerging Markets: The Role of Board of Directors

Leveraging Interorganizational Governance for Bridging Responses to Supply Chain Disruptions: a Polynomial Regression Analysis

Psychological distance as a working tool for managers

Distance still matters. The hard reality of global expansion

Bilateral, Collective, or Both? Formal Governance and Performance in Multisourcing

Managing Knowledge Distance: IT-Enabled Inter-Firm Knowledge Capabilities in Collaborative Innovation

Institutional Distance and Local Isomorphism Strategy

The psychology of psychic distance: Antecedents of asymmetric perceptions

Crossing Borders and Industry Sectors: Behavioral Governance in Strategic Alliances and Product Innovation for Competitive Advantage

Whither geographic proximity? Bypassing local R&D units in foreign university collaboration

Psychic Distance and Budget Control of Foreign Subsidiaries

Beyond products: services-based strategy

Impact of “Distance” on Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from an Emerging Market

Dependence Structure, Trust Dimensions, and Governance Choices in Asian Marketing Channels: Evidence in China

Using design to drive organizational performance and innovation in the corporate workplace: implications for interprofessional environments

Board structure policy, board diversity and social sustainability in the logistics and transportation sector

Diversification, Branding, and Performance of Professional Service Firms

The role of psychological distance in organizational responses to modern slavery risk in supply chains

Shapers or schemers of collaborative governance: network management in England’s Local Enterprise Partnerships

A "Distance Matters" Paradox: Facilitating Intra-Team Collaboration Can Harm Inter-Team Collaboration