Abstract:This technical note introduces business students to the concepts of modeling discrete choice (e.g., a consumer purchasing brand A versus brand B) using logistic regression and maximum-likelihood estimation. It draws the analogy between modeling discrete choice and building a regression model with a dummy dependent variable and on an example illustrates the need for estimating the probability of a choice rather than the choice itself, which leads to a special kind of regression – logistic regression. The note presents the concepts of utility and a random utility choice model, of which the logistic regression model is the most commonly used. It shows how choice probabilities can be constructed from utilities leading to the logit model. It then presents the maximum-likelihood estimation (MLE) method of fitting the logit model to the choice data. Working through a detailed example using Solver and accompanying spreadsheet model, the note gives students deep understanding for how MLE works and how it is similar and different to the standard least-squared estimation in linear regression. The note concludes by presenting the results of estimation using StatTools, a commercial statistical software. The note avoids the use of heavy mathematical machinery but still requires rudimentary knowledge of exponent and logarithmic functions, probability, and optimization with Solver, as well as familiarity with the “standard” linear regression. Applications include building of models for consumer choice, estimating price elasticity, price optimization, product versioning, product line design, and conjoint analysis. Excerpt UVA-QA-0779 Nov. 7, 2011 MODELING DISCRETE CHOICE: CATEGORICAL DEPENDENT VARIABLES, LOGISTIC REGRESSION, AND MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION Consider an individual choosing between two or more discrete alternatives: a shopper in a grocery store deciding between apple or orange juice, or a prospective student determining which of several university offers he ought to accept. For the juice manufacturer and the university, the ability to predict the outcome of such choices is of vital importance. In this note, we will discuss how this might be done. The process we will follow bears some similarity to a regular linear regression but also has substantial differences, primarily due to the fact that the choices are discrete; that is, they correspond to a categorical dependent variable in regression. The Concept of Utility . . .

Model selection in utility-maximizing binary prediction

Maximum Score Estimation of Preference Parameters for a Binary Choice Model under Uncertainty

Myopic Loss Aversion or Equate-to-differentiate Heuristic? A Heuristic Decision Making Model for Both Single and Aggregated Plays.

Portfolio selection under possibilistic mean-variance utility and a SMO algorithm

A Discrete Choice Model for Subset Selection

Two-Stage Maximum Score Estimator

Comparison of Bayesian predictive methods for model selection

Policy Learning with Asymmetric Counterfactual Utilities

An Mpec Estimator for Misclassification Models

Behavioral Portfolio Selection in Continuous Time

Utility Maximization under Uncertainty

Maximization of Non-Concave Utility Functions in Discrete-Time Financial Market Models

Modeling Discrete Choice: Categorical Dependent Variables, Logistic Regression, and Maximum Likelihood Estimation

On utility maximization in discrete-time financial market models

High Dimensional Binary Choice Model with Unknown Heteroskedasticity or Instrumental Variables

Model selection in logistic regression

On Utility Maximisation Under Model Uncertainty in Discrete-Time Markets

Multistage Utility Preference Robust Optimization

Robust Decision Making Using a General Utility Set

Prediction-Oriented Model Selection In Partial Least Squares Path Modeling

MADDM: Multi-Advisor Dynamic Binary Decision-Making by Maximizing the Utility