Circadian patterns of behaviour change during pregnancy in mice

Georgia S. Clarke,Andrew D. Vincent,Sharon R. Ladyman,Kathryn L. Gatford,Amanda J. Page

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1113/jp285553

2024-03-15

The Journal of Physiology

Abstract:figure legend We aimed to determine the impact of pregnancy on the timing of food and water intake, activity and sleep in mice. Food and water intake was increased in late pregnancy, with a 1.6 h delay in the peak in food intake late in the light phase and 0.34 h delay in peak water intake late in the dark phase in comparison to the non‐pregnant group. Dark‐phase activity was lowest in late pregnancy, with a decrease in wakefulness. Activity onset after dark‐phase onset was delayed in pregnant compared with non‐pregnant mice. These behavioural changes contribute to positive energy balance during pregnancy. Food intake and activity adapt during pregnancy to meet the increased energy demands. In comparison to non‐pregnant females, pregnant mice consume more food, eating larger meals during the light phase, and reduce physical activity. How pregnancy changes the circadian timing of behaviour was less clear. We therefore randomised female C57BL/6J mice to mating for study until early (n = 10), mid‐ (n = 10) or late pregnancy (n = 11) or as age‐matched, non‐pregnant controls (n = 12). Mice were housed individually in Promethion cages with a 12 h light–12 h dark cycle [lights on at 07.00 h, Zeitgeber (ZT)0] for behavioural analysis. Food intake between ZT10 and ZT11 was greater in pregnant than non‐pregnant mice on days 6.5–12.5 and 12.5–17.5. In mice that exhibited a peak in the last 4 h of the light phase (ZT8–ZT12), peaks were delayed by 1.6 h in the pregnant compared with the non‐pregnant group. Food intake immediately after dark‐phase onset (ZT13–ZT14) was greater in the pregnant than non‐pregnant group during days 12.5–17.5. Water intake patterns corresponded to food intake. From days 0.5–6.5 onwards, the pregnant group moved less during the dark phase, with decreased probability of being awake, in comparison to the non‐pregnant group. The onset of dark‐phase activity, peaks in activity, and wakefulness were all delayed during pregnancy. In conclusion, increased food intake during pregnancy reflects increased amplitude of eating behaviour, without longer duration. Decreases in activity also contribute to positive energy balance in pregnancy, with delays to all measured behaviours evident from mid‐pregnancy onwards. Key points Circadian rhythms synchronise daily behaviours including eating, drinking and sleep, but how these change in pregnancy is unclear. Food intake increased, with delays in peaks of food intake behaviour late in the light phase from days 6.5 to 12.5 of pregnancy, in comparison to the non‐pregnant group. The onset of activity after lights off (dark phase) was delayed in pregnant compared with non‐pregnant mice. Activity decreased by ∼70% in the pregnant group, particularly in the dark (active) phase, with delays in peaks of wakefulness evident from days 0.5–6.5 of pregnancy onwards. These behavioural changes contribute to positive energy balance during pregnancy. Delays in circadian behaviours during mouse pregnancy were time period and pregnancy stage specific, implying different regulatory mechanisms.

neurosciences,physiology