Initial treatment for FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer based on histological type: A 14‐year multicenter study

Yanna Ye,Guozhao Zhang,Zhiqiang Li,Biliang Chen,Hongwei Zhao,Ying Yang,Li Wang,Jilong Yao,Xiaolin Chen,Yahong Huang,Jinghe Lang,Ping Liu,Chunlin Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6586
IF: 4.711
2023-09-30
Cancer Medicine
Abstract:This study is focused on comparing the oncological outcomes of different treatment modalities (R‐CT, ARH, and NACT) in patients with FIGO2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer based on their histological types (SCC, AC, and ASC). This study included data from 47 hospitals in developing countries and spans a 14‐year period further highlights the potential impact of its findings on the treatment of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer. The findings of this study support the judicious application of treatment strategies for these patients. Background To compare the oncological outcomes of radical chemotherapy (R‐CT), abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery (NACT) for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer, according to histological types: squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (AC)/adenosquamous cell carcinoma (ASC). Methods A comparison of 5‐year overall survival (OS) and disease‐free survival (DFS) was performed for the SCC and AC/ASC subgroups for the three initial treatments, assessed using Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis and validated using propensity score matching (PSM). Results The study included 4086 patients: R‐CT, n = 1913; ARH, n = 1529; and NACT, n = 644. AC/ASC had a lower survival rate (63.7%) than SCC (73.6%) and a higher recurrence and mortality rate (36.3% and 26.4%, respectively). The 5‐year OS and DFS rates were different in the SCC group for R‐CT, ARH, and NACT (OS: 69.8% vs. 80.8% vs. 73.0%, p
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?