Comparative studies of gene expression and the evolution of gene regulation

Irene Gallego Romero,Ilya Ruvinsky,Yoav Gilad
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3229
IF: 59.581
2012-06-18
Nature Reviews Genetics
Abstract:Key PointsThe hypothesis that differences in gene regulation have an important role in speciation and adaptation is more than 40 years old.RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) allows measurement and comparison of gene expression levels across practically any combination of species at an unprecedented resolution.Comparative studies of gene expression levels in all species studied to date provide compelling evidence that most gene regulatory patterns evolve under evolutionary constraint.It is more difficult to infer the action of positive (directional) selection on gene regulation than the action of stabilizing selection, especially in non-model species such as humans and non-human apes, where environmental and genetic effects might be confounded.Inter-species differences in epigenetic markers can probably explain a substantial fraction of gene expression differences between species.Because a broad range of experimental manipulations are possible in model organisms, studies that focus on model species can move beyond simple comparisons of gene expression and offer deep insights into the causal relationship between regulatory changes and phenotypic evolution.Functional studies in model systems can often shed light on the adaptive phenotypes that were affected by regulatory changes between humans and other primates. Some phenotypes, however (for example, the development of language), are inherently difficult to study using model species.It might be possible to use induced pluripotent stem cells derived differentiated cells from humans and non-human primates to test functionally for the outcomes of inter-species differences in gene regulation.
genetics & heredity
What problem does this paper attempt to address?