Research on the pricing strategy and sales model of agricultural products under consumers' poverty alleviation preference - Take Huangshaping Village as an example

Siyi Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v17i.11180
2023-08-31
Abstract:this study with consumer preference for poverty alleviation, under the background of sand ping village poverty alleviation, using the game theory and method, build the Stackelberg model, through mathematical deduction and Matlab simulation, analyze the consumer preference for poverty alleviation on the influence of agricultural products pricing strategy and sales model, in order to provide the important insights of agricultural products out of the dilemma. Considering the two sales models of online retail and live streaming with goods based on e-commerce platforms, the study finds that no matter what sales model you choose, the optimal pricing of the supply chain also increases with the increase of consumers' preference for poverty alleviation. At the same time, when consumers have a low preference for poverty alleviation, agricultural products suppliers should choose the live delivery mode, otherwise, they should choose the online retail mode. According to the impact of different sales models on the profits of offline retailers and e-commerce platforms, this study also finds that there is no strategy that benefits all supply chain players at the same time, that is, no Pareto dominant strategy.
Agricultural and Food Sciences,Economics,Business
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper aims to explore the impact of consumer poverty alleviation preferences on agricultural product pricing strategies and sales models. Specifically, the study analyzes the influence of consumer poverty alleviation preferences on the pricing strategies and sales model choices of various participants in the agricultural product supply chain (including agricultural product suppliers, offline retailers, and e-commerce platforms) by constructing a Stackelberg game model and using game theory methods. The study found: 1. An increase in consumer poverty alleviation preferences will prompt all parties in the agricultural product supply chain to raise prices and increase the degree of poverty alleviation efforts. 2. When consumer poverty alleviation preferences are low, agricultural product suppliers should choose the live streaming sales model; when consumer poverty alleviation preferences are high, they should choose the online retail model. 3. Different sales models have varying impacts on the profits of each participant in the supply chain, and there is no Pareto optimal strategy that benefits all participants. Through these findings, the paper provides scientific guidance for agricultural product suppliers on how to choose a reasonable sales model based on consumer poverty alleviation preferences, while also revealing the impact of different sales models on profit distribution across various links in the supply chain.