Abstract:BackgroundIgE-mediated allergic diseases can be considered a modern epidemic, with exponential growth mainly in industrialized countries. Diagnosis is usually based on detailed medical history, physical examination, skin or challenge test and the determination of allergen-specific serum IgE - a laboratory test that has become a high-value tool in the allergy patient's journey over the last three decades. As the identification of specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) for a given allergen is important to aid in the allergy diagnosis, several methods for detecting IgE in vitro are available worldwide and, in recent years, there have been several improvements in laboratory methodologies bringing greater advances in terms of clinical and analytical performance. The study aims to evaluate the clinical performance and correlation between two different sIgE assays (IMMULITE® 2000 3gAllergyTM and ImmunoCAP) and their concordance with Skin Prick Test (SPT) and clinical history.MethodsThis prospective study was conducted with approximately 130 consecutive patients who underwent evaluation of allergic diseases in different centers in Brazil. Clinical data, blood samples, and SPT results were collected. With the blood samples, the allergens D1, D2 and D201 were evaluated using both methods (IMMULITE® 2000 3gAllergyTM and ImmunoCAP) and the data were evaluated in a correlation study and clinical concordance analysis.ResultsQualitatively evaluating the sIgE results between the two immunoassays, at the cutoff point considered clinically significant (≥ 0.35 KU/L), a total agreement of 95.2% (D1); 95.1% (D2), 91.7% (D201) and 96.8% (Derp2) was observed. Semi-quantitatively evaluating through reactive interpretation, an agreement of 89.5% (D1); 91.06% (D2); 87.60% (D201) and 93.33% (Derp2) was observed. Spearman's correlation between the analytical methods was 0.85 (D1), 0.93 (D2), 0.68 (D201) and 0.76 (Derp2). When compared with the SPT results, a total agreement of 78.7% and 80.1% was obtained for 3gAllergy and ImmunoCAP, respectively, with slightly higher positive agreement for both methods.ConclusionsThe two methods have good agreement with each other, with greater differences when evaluated quantitatively. However, when compared to clinical history and skin prick test results, both perform very similarly with a few differences that may be caused by the difference in the assay design.

Human vs Machine in Bioengineering Allergology: A Comparative Analysis of Conventional vs Innovative Methods for Quantifying Allergological Skin Prick Tests

Skin Prick Automated Test device offers more reliable allergy test results compared to a manual skin prick test

Deep Learning Method Applied to Autonomous Image Diagnosis for Prick Test

Measurement and interpretation of skin prick test results

Case report of an unusual allergic reaction to a routine skin prick test performed in an outpatient clinic: Diagnosis, management, and knowledge gaps

The skin prick test – European standards

Allergen Screening Bioassays: Recent Developments in Lab-on-a-chip and Lab-on-a-disc Systems

Cost-consequence analysis of computer vision-based skin prick tests: implications for cost containment in Switzerland

Longitudinal variability of skin prick test results

Optimization of skin testing. I. Choosing allergen concentrations and cutoff values by factorial design

Allergen-specific IgE: comparison between skin prick test and serum assay in real life

Debates in allergy medicine: Molecular allergy diagnosis with ISAC will replace screenings by skin prick test in the future

Comparison of wheat and rye flour solutions for skin prick testing: a multi-centre study (Stad 1)

Allergy screening including a comparison of prick test results with allergen-coated lancets (Phazet) and liquid extracts

B-056 Clinical and Analytical Performance Evaluation of Two Immunoassays for the Detection of Mite Specific Serum IgE for Allergy Diagnosis

Comparative Performance of 4 Penicillin-Allergy Prediction Strategies in a Large Cohort

In Vitro Monitoring of Human T Cell Responses to Skin Sensitizing Chemicals—A Systematic Review

Allergen Skin Prick Test Should Be Adjusted by the Histamine Reactivity

Are allergen batch differences and the use of double skin prick test important?