High-Throughput Screening of Metal–Organic Frameworks for Ethane–Ethylene Separation Using the Machine Learning Technique

Prosun Halder,Jayant K. Singh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c03063
2020-11-09
Abstract:A hybrid approach combining machine learning algorithms with molecular simulation is utilized to screen hypothetical metal–organic framework (h-MOF) database for the best material to separate ethane (C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>6</sub>) and ethylene (C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub>). In particular, we rationalized the relation between structural and chemical properties of h-MOF with the C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>6</sub>/C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub> selectivity. 8% h-MOFs were chosen randomly from the h-MOF dataset as a training set. The simulations were conducted at 298 K and 1 bar using a multicomponent grand-canonical Monte Carlo method to obtain the C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>6</sub>/C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub> selectivity. Based on the training set, the random forest (RF) model was developed to predict the selectivity of the rest of the h-MOFs. Among all the chemical and structural properties, void fraction plays a significant role in predicting the equilibrium C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>6</sub>/C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub> selectivity. The trained machine learning model can reasonably predict the C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>6</sub>/C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub> selectivity of the remaining h-MOF materials with an RF score of 0.89. Four h-MOFs have shown the best performance, which was compared with the previously discovered materials. The top four h-MOFs were further simulated at different pressures to obtain the adsorption isotherms. Further, the energy contribution of secondary building units and the local density profiles were analyzed to understand the enhanced interaction between h-MOF atoms and C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>6</sub>.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c03063?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c03063</a>.Trained RF model for predicting C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>6</sub>/C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub> selectivity (<a class="ext-link" href="https://github.com/gdev7/h-mof-ethane-ethylene-separation">https://github.com/gdev7/h-mof-ethane-ethylene-separation</a>); relationship between C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>6</sub>/C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub> selectivity with chemical and structural descriptors of MOFs; energy contribution of SBUs with C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>6</sub> and C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub> of rest of the top four h-MOFs; and local density profiles of C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>6</sub> and C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub> against the distance from the SBUs of rest of the top four h-MOFs (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c03063/suppl_file/ef0c03063_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
energy & fuels,engineering, chemical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?