Abstract:Children with intersex variations continue to be subject to elective, irreversible, "sex-normalising" surgical interventions, despite multiple human rights and legislative bodies calling for their prohibition. Our systematic review aims to understand how medical literature reports rationales for "sex-normalising" surgical interventions conducted in childhood, and how they are contextualised within the medical and social controversy surrounding such interventions. PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched for English language, peer-reviewed articles reporting primary data on elective, genital, "sex-normalising" surgical interventions conducted on individuals <10 years, published 01/07/2006-30/06/2023 (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023460871). Data on outcomes reported, rationale for the conduct and timing of interventions and acknowledgement of controversy were extracted. Narrative synthesis described rationales and controversy. Risk of bias was assessed using Johanna Briggs Institute Tools. 11,042 records were retrieved, with 71 articles included for analysis. One of the most common outcomes collected in included literature were cosmetic outcomes, primarily reported by surgeons or parents. 62.0% of studies reported no rationale for intervention timing, 39.4% reported no rationale for conduct and 52.1% acknowledged no controversy in intervention conduct. Rationales included parental desire for intervention, anatomical/functional/cosmetic reasons, and a perceived goal of aligning with sex assigned by surgical teams or parents. Controversies addressed included concerns about the quality of interventions, the ethics of intervention conduct and gendered and social considerations. "Sex-normalising" interventions are conducted based largely on rationales that were not adequately supported by evidence, a desire from parents and surgeons to match genital cosmesis typically ascribed to male and female bodies, and a parental desire for intervention conduct. Legislating and medical regulatory bodies should advocate for ending the conduct of irreversible, elective, "sex-normalising" interventions conducted without the full, free and informed consent of the person concerned, to promote and protect the highest attainable standard of health for people with intersex variations.

The Cass review: an opportunity to unite behind evidence informed care in gender medicine

Gender medicine and the Cass Review: why medicine and the law make poor bedfellows

Medical institutions must treat the Cass review as a significant event and act upon it

Gender medicine in the US: how the Cass review failed to land

Editorial: The Cass Review – implications and reassurance for practitioners

Guidelines on gender related treatment flouted standards and overlooked poor evidence, finds Cass review

Transgender care: BMA adopts neutral position on Cass review after backlash from members

Transgender health research needed

The Myth of "Reliable Research" in Pediatric Gender Medicine: A critical evaluation of the Dutch Studies-and research that has followed

Care pathways of children and adolescents referred to specialist gender services: a systematic review

European Academy of Paediatrics statement on the clinical management of children and adolescents with gender dysphoria

Experiences and Perspectives of Transgender Youths in Accessing Health Care: A Systematic Review

Clinical guidelines for children and adolescents experiencing gender dysphoria or incongruence: a systematic review of guideline quality (part 1)

Recommendations of the Queensland children's gender service external evaluation and their implications for health policy in Australia

State of the Science: Gender-Affirming Care for Transgender and Gender Diverse Youth

Reconsidering Informed Consent for Trans-Identified Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults

Characteristics of children and adolescents referred to specialist gender services: a systematic review

Primary care clinicians' perspectives on interacting with patients with gynaecological conditions: a systematic review

Access to primary care for children and young people (CYP) in the UK: a scoping review of CYPs, caregivers and healthcare professionals views and experiences of facilitators and barriers

Perspectives on conducting "sex-normalising" intersex surgeries conducted in infancy: A systematic review

Multi-stakeholder opinion statement on the care of individuals born with differences of sex development: common ground and opportunities for improvement