From the point of view of farmers, how threatening and harmful are natural hazards? A case study of Sistan Plain using Q methodology

Zahra Khakifirouz,Mehrdad Niknami,Marzieh Keshavarz,Mohammad Sadegh Sabouri
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104278
IF: 4.842
2024-01-22
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Abstract:Droughts, floods, and dust storms have increased the vulnerability of farm families in developing countries. Well-timed and effective interventions could reduce vulnerability to natural hazards. However, the adoption of adaptive strategies is significantly influenced by the farmers' viewpoints about the causes and effects of natural hazards and their perceived capacity to deal with these crises. This study employed the Q methodology to investigate farmers' viewpoints on vulnerability and adaptation to natural hazards in the Sistan Plain, Iran. The Q-sort procedure was conducted with the participation of 29 farmers, and the qmethod package in R software was used to analyze the Q-factor. The results revealed four types of perceptions regarding vulnerability and adaptation to natural hazards: passive-oriented, pragmatic activists, consequentialists, and change-averse. Different viewpoints demonstrate that farmers have divergent opinions regarding vulnerability and adaptation to natural hazards. Identifying these viewpoints can provide useful information for policymaking and the scaling up of specific adaptive strategies for each group, which can eventually enhance farmers' resilience to natural disasters.
geosciences, multidisciplinary,meteorology & atmospheric sciences,water resources
What problem does this paper attempt to address?