The association between device-measured sitting time and cardiometabolic health risk factors in children
Ana María Contardo Ayala,Nicola D. Ridgers,Anna Timperio,Lauren Arundell,David W. Dunstan,Kylie D. Hesketh,Robin M. Daly,Jo Salmon
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18495-w
IF: 4.5
2024-04-12
BMC Public Health
Abstract:Abstract Background There is limited evidence of the associations between postural-derived sitting time, waist-worn derived sedentary time and children’s health and the moderation effect of physical activity (PA). This study examined associations of children’s device-measured sitting time with cardiometabolic health risk factors, including moderation by physical activity. Methods Cross-sectional baseline data from children (mean-age 8.2 ± 0.5 years) in Melbourne, Australia (2010) participating in the TransformUs program were used. Children simultaneously wore an activ PAL to assess sitting time and an ActiGraph GT3X to assess sedentary time and physical activity intensity. Cardiometabolic health risk factors included: adiposity (body mass index [BMI], waist circumference [WC]), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), cholesterol, triglycerides, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), serum insulin, and 25-hydroxyvitaminD (25[OH]D). Linear regression models ( n = 71–113) assessed associations between sitting time with each health risk factor, adjusted for different PA intensities (i.e. light [LIPA], moderate-vigorous intensities [MVPA], separately on each model), age, sex, adiposity, and clustering by school. Interaction terms examined moderation. The analyses were repeated using device-measured sedentary time (i.e. ActiGraph GT3X) for comparison. Results Sitting time was positively associated with SBP ( b = 0.015; 95%CI: 0.004, 0.026), DBP ( b = 0.012; 95%CI:0.004, 0.020), and FPG ( b = 0.001; 95%CI: 0.000, 0.000), after adjusting for higher PA intensities. The association between sitting time and insulin ( b = 0.003; 95%CI: 0.000, 0.006) was attenuated after adjusting for higher PA intensities. When the models were adjusted for LIPA and MVPA, there was a negative association with LDL ( b =-0.001; 95%CI: -0.002, -0.000 and b =-0.001; 95%CI: -0.003, -0.000, respectively). There was a negative association of sedentary time with WCz ( b =-0.003; 95%CI: -0.005, 0.000) and BMIz ( b =-0.003; 95%CI: -0.006, -0.000) when the models were adjusted by MVPA. Sedentary time was positively associated with triglycerides ( b = 0.001; 95%CI: 0.000, 0.001) but attenuated after adjusting for MVPA. No evidence of moderation effects was found. Conclusions Higher volumes of sitting and sedentary time were associated with some adverse associations on some cardiometabolic health risk factors in children. These associations were more evident when sitting time was the predictor. This suggests that reducing time spent sitting may benefit some cardiometabolic health outcomes, but future experimental research is needed to confirm causal relationships and identify the biological mechanisms that might be involved. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12609000715279.
public, environmental & occupational health