What Italian PICU Healthcare Providers Think About Donation After Cardiocirculatory Determination of Death: A National Survey

Cristina Giugni,Costanza Cecchi,Sabrina Giometto,Ersilia Lucenteforte,Cristina Mondardini,Fabrizio Chiusolo,Alberto Giannini,Marinella Astuto,Maria Figini,Marcello Piazza,Alvise Tosoni,Zaccaria Ricci
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.14806
2024-06-26
Pediatric Transplantation
Abstract:Italy lacks an active pDCDD program. To gauge acceptance and anticipate reactions, we surveyed PICU staff attitudes before its launch. Despite limited knowledge, respondents expressed positive attitudes toward pDCDD, supporting Italian legislation on cardiocirculatory death determination and the "dead donor role." Background Italy presently does not have a pediatric organ donation program after cardiocirculatory determination of death (pDCDD). Before implementing a pDCDD program, many centers globally have conducted studies on the attitudes of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) staff. This research aims to minimize potential adverse reactions and evaluate the acceptance of the novel donation practice. Methods We conducted an electronic and anonymous survey on attitudes toward pDCDD among healthcare professionals (HCPs) working at eight Italian PICUs. The survey had three parts: (I) questions about general demographic data; (II) 18 statements about personal wishes to donate, experience of discussing donation, and knowledge about donation; (III) attitudinal statements regarding two pediatric Maastricht III scenarios of organ donation. Results The response rate was 54.4%, and the majority of respondents were nurses. Of those who responded, 45.3% worked in the Center, 40.8% in the North, and 12.8% in the South of Italy. In total, 93.9% supported pediatric organ and tissue donation, 90.3% supported donation after neurological determination of death (DNDD), 78.2% supported pDCDD, and 69.7% felt comfortable about the idea of participating in pDCDD on Type III patients, with a higher percentage of supportive responses in the Center (77.2%) than in the North (65.1%) and South (54.5%) of Italy (p‐value
pediatrics,transplantation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?