JAK-inhibitors for coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): a meta-analysis

Chong-xiang Chen,Jiao-jiao Wang,Huan Li,Le-tao Yuan,Robert Peter Gale,Yang Liang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-021-01266-6
2021-05-14
Leukemia
Abstract:We analyzed reports on safety and efficacy of <i>JAK</i>-inhibitors in patients with coronavirus infectious disease-2019 (COVID-19) published between January 1st and March 6th 2021 using the Newcastle-Ottawa and Jadad scales for quality assessment. We used disease severity as a proxy for time when <i>JAK</i>-inhibitor therapy was started. We identified 6 cohort studies and 5 clinical trials involving 2367 subjects treated with ruxolitinib (<i>N</i> = 3) or baricitinib 45 (<i>N</i> = 8). Use of <i>JAK</i>-inhibitors decreased use of invasive mechanical ventilation (RR = 0.63; [95% Confidence Interval (CI), 0.47, 0.84]; <i>P</i> = 0.002) and had borderline impact on rates of intensive care unit (ICU) admission (RR = 0.24 [0.06, 1.02]; <i>P</i> = 0.05) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS; RR = 0.50 [0.19, 1.33]; <i>P</i> = 0.16). <i>JAK</i>-inhibitors did not decrease length of hospitalization (mean difference (MD) –0.18 [–4.54, 4.18]; <i>P</i> = 0.94). Relative risks of death for both drugs were 0.42 [0.30, 0.59] (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001), for ruxolitinib, RR = 0.33 (0.13, 0.88; <i>P</i> = 0.03) and for baricitinib RR = 0.44 (0.31, 0.63; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Timing of <i>JAK</i>-inhibitor treatment during the course of COVID-19 treatment may be important in determining impact on outcome. However, these data are not consistently reported.
oncology,hematology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?