Assessing Nutritional Status in Gastric Cancer Patients after Total versus Subtotal Gastrectomy: Cross-Sectional Study

Fawzy Akad,Bogdan Filip,Cristina Preda,Florin Zugun-Eloae,Sorin Nicolae Peiu,Nada Akad,Dragos-Valentin Crauciuc,Ruxandra Vatavu,Liviu-Ciprian Gavril,Roxana-Florentina Sufaru,Veronica Mocanu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16101485
IF: 5.9
2024-05-15
Nutrients
Abstract:Gastric cancer (GC) remains a significant global health concern, ranking as the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Malnutrition is common in GC patients and can negatively impact prognosis and quality of life. Understanding nutritional issues and their management is crucial for improving patient outcomes. This cross-sectional study included 51 GC patients who underwent curative surgery, either total or subtotal gastrectomy. Various nutritional assessments were conducted, including anthropometric measurements, laboratory tests, and scoring systems such as Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/World Health Organization Performance Status (ECOG/WHO PS), Observer-Reported Dysphagia (ORD), Nutritional Risk Screening-2002 (NRS-2002), Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA), and Simplified Nutritional Appetite Questionnaire (SNAQ). Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels were significantly higher in the subtotal gastrectomy group. Nutritional assessments indicated a higher risk of malnutrition in patients who underwent total gastrectomy, as evidenced by higher scores on ORD, NRS-2002, and PG-SGA. While total gastrectomy was associated with a higher risk of malnutrition, no single nutritional parameter emerged as a strong predictor of surgical approach. PG-SGA predominantly identified malnutrition, with its occurrence linked to demographic factors such as female gender and age exceeding 65 years.
nutrition & dietetics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the frequency of postoperative malnutrition and its related factors in gastric cancer patients after undergoing total gastrectomy (TG) and subtotal gastrectomy (SG). Specifically, the study aims to compare the impact of the two surgical methods on the nutritional status of patients through a series of nutritional assessment tools, and to explore the association between laboratory test results and subjective scoring systems in evaluating the nutritional status during the postoperative recovery period. ### Research Background - **Gastric Cancer (GC)** is the third leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Although its incidence has declined in the past 50 years, it remains an important public health problem. - **Malnutrition** is very common among gastric cancer patients and may seriously affect the prognosis and quality of life of patients. - **Surgical treatment** is one of the standard treatment methods for gastric cancer, mainly including total gastrectomy and subtotal gastrectomy. These surgeries may change the gastrointestinal anatomical structure and physiological function of patients, affect nutrient absorption and cause gastrointestinal symptoms. ### Research Objectives - **Evaluate** the frequency of postoperative malnutrition in gastric cancer patients who have undergone total gastrectomy and subtotal gastrectomy. - **Analyze** the association between postoperative malnutrition and laboratory test results and subjective scoring systems to identify useful prognostic factors. ### Research Methods - **Research Design**: A prospective study, a total of 51 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer were included, among which 22 patients underwent total gastrectomy and 29 patients underwent subtotal gastrectomy. - **Nutritional Assessment Tools**: - **ECOG/WHO Performance Status Score** (ECOG/WHO PS) - **Observer - Reported Dysphagia (ORD)** - **Nutritional Risk Screening - 2002 (NRS - 2002)** - **Patient - Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG - SGA)** - **Simplified Nutritional Appetite Questionnaire (SNAQ)** ### Main Findings - **CEA Level**: The serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level in the subtotal gastrectomy group was significantly higher than that in the total gastrectomy group. - **Malnutrition Risk**: Patients in the total gastrectomy group showed a higher risk of malnutrition in ORD, NRS - 2002 and PG - SGA scores. - **Gender and Age**: Female patients and patients over 65 years old were more likely to be identified as malnourished in the PG - SGA score. - **Effectiveness of Nutritional Assessment Tools**: No single nutritional parameter can be a strong predictor of the surgical method, but PG - SGA is more prominent in identifying malnutrition. ### Conclusions - Patients after total gastrectomy are at a higher risk of malnutrition, which may be related to the invasiveness of the tumor and the systemic effects of cancer cachexia. - Early identification and active nutritional support are important components of multidisciplinary care and help to improve the treatment effect and quality of life of gastric cancer patients. ### Recommendations - In clinical practice, multiple nutritional assessment tools should be combined to comprehensively evaluate the nutritional status of gastric cancer patients and formulate personalized nutritional intervention measures. - Further research can explore more effective nutritional assessment tools and intervention strategies to improve the postoperative recovery quality of gastric cancer patients.