Abstract:We generalize the projection-based quantum measurement-driven $k$-SAT algorithm of Benjamin, Zhao, and Fitzsimons (BZF, <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1711.02687" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.02687">arXiv:1711.02687</a>) to arbitrary strength quantum measurements, including the limit of continuous monitoring. In doing so, we clarify that this algorithm is a particular case of the measurement-driven quantum control strategy elsewhere referred to as "Zeno dragging". We argue that the algorithm is most efficient with finite time and measurement resources in the continuum limit, where measurements have an infinitesimal strength and duration. Moreover, for solvable $k$-SAT problems, the dynamics generated by the algorithm converge deterministically towards target dynamics in the long-time (Zeno) limit, implying that the algorithm can successfully operate autonomously via Lindblad dissipation, without detection. We subsequently study both the conditional and unconditional dynamics of the algorithm implemented via generalized measurements, quantifying the advantages of detection for heralding errors. These strategies are investigated first in a computationally-trivial $2$-qubit $2$-SAT problem to build intuition, and then we consider the scaling of the algorithm on $3$-SAT problems encoded with $4 - 10$ qubits. The average number of shots needed to obtain a solution scales with qubit number as $\lambda^n$. For vanishing dragging time (with final readout only), we find $\lambda = 2$ (corresponding to a brute-force search over possible solutions). However, the deterministic (autonomous) property of the algorithm in the adiabatic (Zeno) limit implies that we can drive $\lambda$ arbitrarily close to $1$, at the cost of a growing pre-factor. We numerically investigate the tradeoffs in these scalings with respect to algorithmic runtime and assess their implications for using this analog measurement-driven approach to quantum computing in practice.

Estimation of Complexity for the Ohya-Masuda-Volovich SAT Algorithm

Exponential Complexity of the Quantum Adiabatic Algorithm for certain Satisfiability Problems

Detailed Account of Complexity for Implementation of Some Gate-Based Quantum Algorithms

Amplitude amplification-inspired QAOA: Improving the success probability for solving 3SAT

An Almost Sudden Jump in Quantum Complexity

Measurement-driven quantum computing: Performance of a 3-SAT solver

qSAT: Design of an Efficient Quantum Satisfiability Solver for Hardware Equivalence Checking

Quantum Approximate Optimisation for Not-All-Equal SAT

Variational learning algorithms for quantum query complexity

Quantum Computing, NP-complete Problems and Chaotic Dynamics

Limitations of Quantum Approximate Optimization in Solving Generic Higher-Order Constraint-Satisfaction Problems

On exponential polynomials and quantum computing

Towards quantifying complexity with quantum mechanics

Solving k-SAT problems with generalized quantum measurement

Solving the B-SAT Problem Using Quantum Computing: Smaller Is Sometimes Better

Solving boolean satisfiability problems with the quantum approximate optimization algorithm

Solution of SAT Problems with the Adaptive-Bias Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm

Saturation and recurrence of quantum complexity in random local quantum dynamics

Efficient Digital Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization Solvers for SAT Problems

3-SAT solver for two-way quantum computers