Evaluating the Efficacy of Type 2 Diabetes Polygenic Risk Scores in an Independent European Population

Monta Brīvība,Ivanna Atava,Raitis Pečulis,Ilze Elbere,Laura Ansone,Maija Rozenberga,Ivars Silamiķelis,Jānis Kloviņš
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25021151
IF: 5.6
2024-01-18
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Abstract:Numerous type 2 diabetes (T2D) polygenic risk scores (PGSs) have been developed to predict individuals' predisposition to the disease. An independent assessment and verification of the best-performing PGS are warranted to allow for a rapid application of developed models. To date, only 3% of T2D PGSs have been evaluated. In this study, we assessed all (n = 102) presently published T2D PGSs in an independent cohort of 3718 individuals, which has not been included in the construction or fine-tuning of any T2D PGS so far. We further chose the best-performing PGS, assessed its performance across major population principal component analysis (PCA) clusters, and compared it with newly developed population-specific T2D PGS. Our findings revealed that 88% of the published PGSs were significantly associated with T2D; however, their performance was lower than what had been previously reported. We found a positive association of PGS improvement over the years (p-value = 8.01 × 10−4 with PGS002771 currently showing the best discriminatory power (area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) = 0.669) and PGS003443 exhibiting the strongest association PGS003443 (odds ratio (OR) = 1.899). Further investigation revealed no difference in PGS performance across major population PCA clusters and when compared with newly developed population-specific PGS. Our findings revealed a positive trend in T2D PGS performance, consistently identifying high-T2D-risk individuals in an independent European population.
biochemistry & molecular biology,chemistry, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?