Abstract:The rapid development of the new energy vehicle industry is an essential part of reducing CO2 emissions in the transportation sector and achieving carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals. This vigorous development of the new energy vehicle industry has generated many end-of-life power batteries that cannot be recycled and reused, which has brought serious consequences for the environment. In order to solve the negative externality problem brought by EoL power batteries, how the government intervenes in the development of the market and guides multiple parties to cooperate in recycling EoL power batteries is a question worthy of deep consideration. In this paper, we consider that the government acts before recycling companies and consumers, and recycling companies and consumers act again according to the policy. First, we examine an evolutionary game model of recycling companies and consumers in the absence of the government and explore their choice strategies in various scenarios. Second, we examine how government subsidies to recycling companies and consumers may change the trend toward positive recycling in different circumstances. This paper compares the effects of government policies on subsidies to recycling companies, subsidies to consumers, and subsidies to recycling companies and consumers. Finally, the paper proposes policy suggestions from the perspectives of the government, recycling companies, and consumers. The conclusion suggests that the market does not guarantee a high return for both parties without government subsidies. It is difficult for recyclers and consumers to cooperate proactively in recycling end-of-life power batteries. Thus, it is found that government subsidies to recycling companies and consumers can maximize social welfare at the lowest government cost. Even though government subsidies are currently targeted at recycling companies, they should gradually be extended to consumers as the industry develops.

The impacts of subsidy policies and channel encroachment on the power battery recycling of new energy vehicles

Production and recycling of new energy vehicle power batteries under channel encroachment and government subsidy

Research on recycling decision of waste power batteries under subsidy-penalty policy

Study on the impact of government policies on power battery recycling under different recycling models

Power Battery Recycling Model of Closed-Loop Supply Chains Considering Different Power Structures Under Government Subsidies

Government Subsidy Strategies for the New Energy Vehicle Power Battery Recycling Industry

Analysis of Recycling Strategy of Waste Power Batteries Driven by Government Subsidies

Research on Closed-Loop Supply Chain Decision Making of Power Battery Considering Subsidy Transfer under EPR System

Government subsidies in the power battery recycling industry

The Pricing Strategy of Dual Recycling Channels for Power Batteries of New Energy Vehicles under Government Subsidies

Pricing and production R&D decisions in power battery closed-loop supply chain considering government subsidy

Optimizing Green Strategy for Retired Electric Vehicle Battery Recycling: An Evolutionary Game Theory Approach

A decision-making model for echelon utilization of retired batteries in competitive duopoly: the role of government subsidy

Research on power battery recycling mode selection considering dual behavioral preferences under different government subsidies

Dual credit policy: Promoting new energy vehicles with battery recycling in a competitive environment?

Coordination of New Energy Vehicles Closed-Loop Supply Chain under Government Subsidies and Different Power Structures

The social-economic-environmental impacts of recycling retired EV batteries under reward-penalty mechanism

Sustaining the advancement of new energy vehicles in the post-subsidy era: Carbon quota mechanisms and subsidy mechanisms for recycling of used batteries