Post-hoc vs ante-hoc explanations: xAI design guidelines for data scientists

Carl O. Retzlaff,Alessa Angerschmid,Anna Saranti,David Schneeberger,Richard Roettger,Heimo Mueller,Andreas Holzinger
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2024.101243
IF: 4.541
2024-05-08
Cognitive Systems Research
Abstract:The growing field of explainable Artificial Intelligence (xAI) has given rise to a multitude of techniques and methodologies, yet this expansion has created a growing gap between existing xAI approaches and their practical application. This poses a considerable obstacle for data scientists striving to identify the optimal xAI technique for their needs. To address this problem, our study presents a customized decision support framework to aid data scientists in choosing a suitable xAI approach for their use-case. Drawing from a literature survey and insights from interviews with five experienced data scientists, we introduce a decision tree based on the trade-offs inherent in various xAI approaches, guiding the selection between six commonly used xAI tools. Our work critically examines six prevalent ante-hoc and post-hoc xAI methods, assessing their applicability in real-world contexts through expert interviews. The aim is to equip data scientists and policymakers with the capacity to select xAI methods that not only demystify the decision-making process, but also enrich user understanding and interpretation, ultimately advancing the application of xAI in practical settings.
psychology, experimental,neurosciences,computer science, artificial intelligence
What problem does this paper attempt to address?