Transmitral Pressure Gradients in Patients With Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation After Robotic Mitral Valve Repair With Leaflet Preservation Techniques

Madison I. Goldberger,Angela Pollak,Matthew Fuller,Katherine Sun,Fawaz Alenezi,Donald Glower,Alina Nicoara
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.70001
2024-10-18
Echocardiography
Abstract:In a population of patients undergoing robotic MV repair with leaflet preservation, we found that TMPGs in the immediate postoperative period are slightly higher than the intraoperative postrepair TMPGs. The gradients seem to decrease over time at long‐term follow‐up, especially for patients with an intraoperative postrepair mean TMPG ≤3 mmHg. Introduction The hemodynamic effects of mitral valve repair (MVr) with respect to transmitral pressure gradients (TMPGs) have not been described well in patients undergoing leaflet preservation techniques. In a population of patients undergoing robotic MVr with leaflet preservation, we investigate the expected change of the postrepair intraoperative TMPG in the postoperative follow‐up period. Methods We retrospectively studied 144 adult patients who underwent robotic MVr. Demographic, clinical, procedural, and echocardiographic data were collected and analyzed. Results We found a slight increase in the mean TMPG from the intraoperative postrepair to the immediate postoperative period (intraoperative 3.3 ± 1.4 mmHg vs. first postoperative transthoracic echocardiography [TTE] follow‐up 3.6 ± 1.9 mmHg, p = 0.016) with a gradual decline in the long‐term follow‐up (mean TMPG at last follow‐up TTE 2.4+2.1 mmHg). When dichotomizing the patient population using a cutoff of 3 mmHg for the intraoperative mean TMPG, patients with an intraoperative mean TMPG > 3 mmHg had higher mean TMPG gradients at first TTE (4.5 ± 2.4 vs. 3.1 ± 1.3 mmHg, p 3 mmHg have a higher mean TMPG at follow‐up. The hemodynamic effect does not seem to have an impact on clinical outcome.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?