Patterns in abundance, size and space‐use of Giant Mud Crab (Scylla serrata) in a temperate marine protected area

Daniel E. Hewitt,Daniel D. Johnson,Luke Erskine,David Harasti,Iain M. Suthers,Matthew D. Taylor
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.4167
2024-05-20
Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
Abstract:Abstract Marine Protected Areas limit fishing to protect a broad range of species and enhance biodiversity. Consequently, closures may not benefit species equally and species‐specific assessments are required to determine the impact of closures. Relative abundance and size of Giant Mud Crab ( Scylla serrata ) was compared across no‐take and fished zones in Port Stephens‐Great Lakes Marine Park, on the temperate east coast of Australia (32.45°S). In addition, passive acoustic telemetry was used to estimate daily space‐use areas. Similar abundances were observed between no‐take and fished zones; however certain no‐take sites had higher abundances than others. In addition, crabs were 9.9 mm larger in no‐take zones on average. Daily crab space‐use varied widely (~4 to 1000 m 2 ), and generally increased with water temperature and conductivity. These patterns indicate that recruitment processes interact with marine park protection to shape crab abundances across estuaries. However no‐take zoning appears to primarily limit fishing mortality on legal size crabs (i.e., carapace length >85 mm) resulting in larger crabs within no‐take zones. This may mean no‐take zones enhance reproductive output of crab populations since larger individuals are likely to be more fecund.
environmental sciences,water resources,marine & freshwater biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?