Abstract:Background: Patients desire information about health care costs because they are increasingly responsible for these costs. Public Web sites that offer cost information could inform provider-patient discussions of costs at the point of care. Objective: To evaluate tools to facilitate the use of publicly available cost information during clinical visits for low back pain (LBP). Design: Qualitative study using individual and group interviews and surveys. Setting: 6 rural primary care practices in 2 health systems in Maine. Participants: Practice staff (n = 50) and adult patients with LBP (n = 72). Intervention: Participating health systems and practices were offered financial incentives, a series of trainings, and technical assistance to pilot tools for discussing costs of LBP care using CompareMaine.org, Maine's cost and quality transparency Web site. Measurements: Integration of tools into workflow, awareness and value to providers, and patient experience were identified through 11 group interviews with practice staff (n = 25) and health system leaders (n = 11), provider (n = 25), and patient (n = 47) surveys; patient interviews (n = 5); and administrative data. Results: The intervention increased provider and consumer awareness of CompareMaine.org, but minimally changed use in clinical discussions as a result of fewer-than-expected patients with LBP, limited system support, workflow barriers, and providers' reluctance to adopt the tools because of perceptions of limited value for their patients. In contrast, patients valued cost conversations and found the tools useful, and over one half reported intending to use CompareMaine.org during future care decisions. Limitations: Generalizability was limited by the small number of practices and participants. Lower-than-anticipated participation precluded examination of the effect of the tool on the frequency of cost-of-care conversations. Conclusion: This multicomponent intervention to introduce publicly reported cost information into LBP clinical discussions had low provider uptake. Whereas cost conversations and CompareMaine.org were perceived as useful by participating patients with LBP, providers were uncomfortable discussing cost variation at the point of care. Successful use of public cost information during clinical visits will require normalizing use to a broader group of patients and greater provider outreach and health system engagement. Primary funding source: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

The intangible costs of living with low back pain from a patient perspective: a scoping review

A systematic review and meta-synthesis of the impact of low back pain on people’s lives

Content validation of the COST for patient questionnaire (COPAQ) for patients with low back pain: a qualitative study

Patients’ perceived needs for medical services for non-specific low back pain: A systematic scoping review

Comparative Review of the Socioeconomic Burden of Lower Back Pain in the United States and Globally

The Global Spine Care Initiative: a narrative review of psychological and social issues in back pain in low- and middle-income communities

Health-related Quality of Life in Patients with Low Back Pain

Negative health impacts of navigating the healthcare system for musculoskeletal conditions: A scoping review protocol

The Impact of Chronic Pain on Quality of Life

Factors influencing imaging clinical decision-making in low back pain management. A scoping review

Estimating the cost of sports injuries: a scoping review

Impact of contextual factors on patient outcomes following conservative low back pain treatment: systematic review

Understanding cultural influences on back pain and back pain research

Extravertebral low back pain: a scoping review

Clinical care standards for the management of low back pain: a scoping review

Experiences of chronic low back pain: a meta-ethnography of qualitative research

Examining Resilient Pain Behaviors for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Scoping Review

Using Public Cost Information During Low Back Pain Visits: A Qualitative Study

Sociodemographic determinants of health inequities in low back pain: a narrative review

Effectiveness of interventions designed to reduce the use of imaging for low-back pain: a systematic review

Patients' experiences with musculoskeletal spinal pain: A qualitative systematic review protocol