Cleaning up the Game: Perspectives on the Evolution of Professional Sports

John Wilson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11191-6_3
1992-01-01
Abstract:This essay considers the grounds for claiming that figurational sociology provides a distinctive and innovative perspective on sport. After a brief review of the general theory of societal development formulated by Norbert Elias, the relation of that theory to those formulated by Marx and Durkheim is described. I argue that there is much of Marx in the figurational account of societal development. However, there is much more of Durkheim, a fact I seek to demonstrate by examining the concept of ‘interdependency’ and its relation to the evolution of codes of conduct. I then describe a competing theory of the history of manners which, I believe, provides a more accurate picture of the civilizing process, at least as it is found in the United States today. This competing theory attaches more significance than does figurational sociology to the peculiar ‘logic’ of capitalism. The increasing regulation of play, I contend, does not so much represent the permeation of courtly values as the imposition of a rationality upon play such as to make it amenable to commodification. Codes of conduct are thus interpretable as a means of imposing order upon activities and thus excluding from those activities elements of conduct which would disturb exchange relations. These elements include communal and democratic impulses. To explore these themes I examine the rise of the ‘commissioner system’ in American team sports.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?