Abstract:The beginning of the 21st-century resulted in a more developed multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) tool and inspired new application areas that have resulted in discoveries in sustainable construction and building life cycle analysis. Construction and civil engineering stand for the central axis of a body consisting of a multidisciplinary (multi-dimensional) world with ties to disciplines constituting the surface, and with the disciplines, as a consequence, tied to each other. When dealing with multi-attribute decision-making problems generally multiple solutions exist, especially when there is a large number of attributes, and the concept of Pareto-optimality is inefficient. The symmetry and structural regularity are essential concepts in many natural and man-made objects and play a crucial role in the design, engineering, and development of the world. The complexity and risks inherent in projects along with different effective indicators for success and failure may contribute to the difficulties in performance evaluation. In such situations, increasing the importance of uncertainty is observed. This paper proposes a novel integrated tool to find a balance between sustainable development, environmental impact and human well-being, i. e. to find symmetry axe with respect to goals, risks, and constraints (attributes) to cope with the complicated problems. The concept of “optimal solution” as the maximum degree of implemented goals (attributes) is very important. The model is built using the most relevant variables cited in the reviewed project literature and integrates two methods: the Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) method and a novel interval-valued fuzzy extension of the Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method. This model was used to solve real case study of oil and gas well drilling projects evaluation. Despite the importance of oil and gas well drilling projects, there is lack of literature that describes and evaluates performance in this field projects. On the other hand, no structured assessment methodology has been presented for these types of projects. Given the limited research on performance evaluation in oil & gas well-drilling projects, the research identifies a set of performance criteria and proposes an evaluation model using fuzzy Delphi method. An illustrative example shows that the proposed method is a useful and alternative decision-making method.

MCA Based Performance Evaluation of Project Selection

A novel hybrid MCDM model for performance evaluation of research and technology organizations based on BSC approach

Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Weighted Scoring Method (WSM), and Hybrid Knowledge Based System (HKBS) for Software Selection: A Comparative Study

Evaluation and selection of Medical Tourism sites: A rough AHP based MABAC approach

Are MCDM methods useful? A critical review of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Analytic Network Process (ANP)

The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in project portfolio selection: a literature review and future research directions

Supplier Selection Problem by Applying Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) Methodology

A New Enhanced ARAS Method for Critical Path Selection of Engineering Projects with Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets

Evaluating project management criteria using fuzzy analytic hierarchy Process

A Novel Approach for Evaluation of Projects Using an Interval–Valued Fuzzy Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) Method: A Case Study of Oil and Gas Well Drilling Projects

MDO Algorithm Performance Evaluation Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process

Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods Comparison

Analysis of a Robot Selection Problem Using Two Newly Developed Hybrid MCDM Models of TOPSIS-ARAS and COPRAS-ARAS

An integrated multi-objective decision making process for the performance evaluation of the vendors

EVALUATION OF INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS BY A DECISION MODEL BASED ON RPR, MABAC, AND WASPAS METHODS WITH INTERVAL-VALUED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SETS

Application of Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Environmental Decision Making

Analysis by Interactive Multiple Criteria Decision Making Method for Comparison Among Different Port Engineering Construction Projects

Multi criteria decision making approach for selecting effort estimation model

Large-scale multiple criteria decision-making with missing values: project selection through TOPSIS-OPA

Multicriteria Decision Making with Cognitive Limitations: A DS/AHP-Based Approach.

Selection of Criteria Using MCDM Techniques -- An Application in Renewable Energy