Abstract:The 2008–2009 Global Financial Crisis (GFC) has swayed regulators to set forth the Solvency II agreement for determining Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) for insurance companies. In this paper, we apply novel internal models to investigate whether the latest version of the Solvency II standard model demands sufficient capital charges, both in normal and stressed times, for the different risk categories included in bond and stock portfolios. Because the GFC has shown that extreme events on the tail of probability distributions can occur quite often, our empirical findings indicate that the magnitude of the equity risk using the GJR–EVT–Copula method requires insurers to keep more SCR for stock portfolios than the Solvency II standard model. In the case of a bond portfolio, we conclude that the Solvency II standard model requires approximately the same SCR as our internal model for the higher quality and longer maturity bonds, whereas the standard model overestimates SCR for the lower quality and shorter maturity bonds. At the same time, the standard model underestimates interest-rate risk and overestimates spread risk. Overall, the discrepancies in the estimated SCRs between the Solvency II standard technique and our internal models increase as the level of the risks rise for both stock and bond markets. Our empirical results are in line with other competing internal modeling techniques regarding stock market investment and bond portfolios with the higher quality and longer maturity bonds, while for the lower quality and shorter maturity bonds, the results contradict other modeling procedures. The obtained empirical results are interesting in terms of theory and practical applications and have important implication for compliance with the Solvency II capital requirements. Likewise, it can be of interest to insurance regulators, policymakers, actuaries, and researchers within the field of insurance and risk management.

The United States RBC Standards, Solvency II and the Swiss Solvency Test: A Comparative Assessment

Capital Requirements for Cyber Risk and Cyber Risk Insurance: An Analysis of Solvency II, the U.S. Risk-Based Capital Standards, and the Swiss Solvency Test

Global Consistent or Market-Oriented? A Quantitative Assessment of RBC Standards, Solvency II, and C-ROSS

The Solvency II Process: Overview and Critical Analysis

Sectoral Asset Concentrations and Insurance Solvency Regulation

Analyzing the Impact of Time Horizon, Volatility and Profit Margins on Solvency Capital: Proposing a New Model for the Global Regulation of the Insurance Industry

Assessing the Basel II Internal Ratings-Based Approach: Empirical Evidence from Australia

Diversification, protection of liability holders and regulatory arbitrage

Measuring market and credit risk under Solvency II: evaluation of the standard technique versus internal models for stock and bond markets

An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Risks and Capital for Insurance in China---Based on the Methods of 2 SLS and 2 SQR

A comparative analysis of current credit risk models

Towards a Global Solvency Model in the Insurance Market: A Qualitative Analysis

Market-consistent valuation of insurance liabilities by cost of capital

On a capital allocation principle coherent with the Solvency 2 standard formula

Improving risk-equalization in Switzerland: Effects of alternative reform proposals on reallocating public subsidies for hospitals

Capital allocation and RORAC optimization under solvency 2 standard formula

Ranking consistency of systemic risk measures: a simulation-based analysis in a banking network model

A theory of risk, return and solvency

What is the optimal capital ratio implying a stable European banking system?

On the necessity of five risk measures