Comparison of Six Sensor Fusion Algorithms with Electrogoniometer Estimation of Wrist Angle in Simulated Work Tasks

Arvin Razavi,Mikael Forsman,Farhad Abtahi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s24134173

IF: 3.9

2024-06-28

Sensors

Abstract:Hand-intensive work is strongly associated with work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) of the hand/wrist and other upper body regions across diverse occupations, including office work, manufacturing, services, and healthcare. Addressing the prevalence of WMSDs requires reliable and practical exposure measurements. Traditional methods like electrogoniometry and optical motion capture, while reliable, are expensive and impractical for field use. In contrast, small inertial measurement units (IMUs) may provide a cost-effective, time-efficient, and user-friendly alternative for measuring hand/wrist posture during real work. This study compared six orientation algorithms for estimating wrist angles with an electrogoniometer, the current gold standard in field settings. Six participants performed five simulated hand-intensive work tasks (involving considerable wrist velocity and/or hand force) and one standardised hand movement. Three multiplicative Kalman filter algorithms with different smoothers and constraints showed the highest agreement with the goniometer. These algorithms exhibited median correlation coefficients of 0.75–0.78 for flexion/extension and 0.64 for radial/ulnar deviation across the six subjects and five tasks. They also ranked in the top three for the lowest mean absolute differences from the goniometer at the 10th, 50th, and 90th percentiles of wrist flexion/extension (9.3°, 2.9°, and 7.4°, respectively). Although the results of this study are not fully acceptable for practical field use, especially for some work tasks, they indicate that IMU-based wrist angle estimation may be useful in occupational risk assessments after further improvements.

engineering, electrical & electronic,chemistry, analytical,instruments & instrumentation

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem this paper attempts to address is: a comparative study of using six sensor fusion algorithms and an electrogoniometer to estimate wrist angles in simulated work tasks. Specifically, the paper focuses on how to accurately measure the posture of the hand and wrist in actual work using low-cost, portable inertial measurement units (IMUs), particularly the absolute angles. Traditional measurement methods such as electrogoniometers and optical motion capture systems, while reliable, are expensive and not suitable for field use. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the performance of IMUs combined with different sensor fusion algorithms in estimating wrist angles, with the goal of finding a cost-effective, time-efficient, and user-friendly alternative for occupational risk assessment and the prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs).