Efficacy and safety of once-weekly basal insulin versus once-daily basal insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Xinxin Wang,Wei Xiao,Zhanpeng Liang,Shixiang Li,Qizhi Tang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000036308
IF: 1.6
2024-01-10
Medicine
Abstract:The increasing number of people with diabetes worldwide not only poses a serious threat to human health, but also brings huge economic burden to society. As one of the 2 major drugs in the treatment of diabetes (insulin and oral hypoglycemic drugs), insulin has been a great boon for hundreds of millions of diabetic patients who need insulin treatment. Treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) often requires the addition of basal insulin as the disease progresses if the patient does not meet blood glucose targets. [ 1 ] Compared with oral hypoglycemic drugs, insulin needs to be injected, thereby bringing inconvenience to many patients. According to the currently approved clinical application of insulin analogues, patients with diabetes often need to be injected at least once a day, possibly 2 to 4 times, and may also need to be combined with oral drugs for treatment, which mean complex treatment strategies and tedious self-blood glucose management. [ 2 ] Clinical inertia is common in the management of T2D due to the need for frequent injections, and is often the reason why blood sugar is not effectively controlled. [ 3–5 ] Although once-daily basal insulin analogues have solved some of these problems, long-term daily injection therapy is still a heavy burden on patients. Thus, reducing the number of injections may increase the acceptance and adherence of patients with T2D to insulin therapy, ultimately leading to improve blood sugar control. Weekly GLP1 injections improve treatment adherence and durability compared to daily injections, and these improvements may lead to better blood sugar control. [ 6–9 ] With the successful marketing of "once a week" glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) weekly formulations, people are full of expectations for once-weekly basal insulin. Recent clinical studies have found a similar effect with once-weekly basal insulin. [ 10 , 11 ] At present, the current research of basic insulin preparation mainly includes Basal Insulin Fc (BIF) and icodec 2 types. Randomized controlled studies of these 2 types of insulin show some promise to change the treatment landscape. To more fully evaluate the role of weekly basal insulin, we conducted a meta-analysis that pooled all current randomized controlled studies comparing the efficacy and safety of once-weekly basal insulin to once-daily basal insulin in patients with T2D.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?