Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To investigate the possibility for human papillomavirus (HPV) infection to be a predictable signal for the carcinogenesis of oral mucosa by comparing the prevalences of HPV in each stage of oral mucosal carcinogenesis and to compare the sensitivity differences of the two methods in detecting HPV infection in oral cavity.METHODS:The hybrid capture (HC-II) was used to detect infection of HPV in 255 samples taken from 12 cases of healthy oral mucosa, 211 cases of patients with pathological diagnosis and 32 cases of patients with clinical diagnosis. The diagnosed cases included 8 cases of benign lesions of the oral mucosa, precancerous lesions [74 cases of oral leukoplakia (OLK) with hyperplasia and 42 cases of OLK with oral epithelial dysplasia (OED)], 91 cases of precancerous condition [oral lichen planus (OLP)] and 28 cases of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). And in situ hybridization (ISH) was used to detect infection of HPV in 33 cases of OSCC and 76 cases of OLK, including 30 cases of hyperplasia, 15 cases of mild OED, 15 cases of moderate OED and 16 cases of severe OED.RESULTS:The prevalence of HPV in OLP samples was higher (12.12%, 8/66) than that of OLK (2.59%, 3/116) (χ(2)=4.666, P=0.031) and OSCC(7.14%, 2/28, χ(2)=0.513, P=0.474). The prevalence of HPV in OSCC (7.14%, 2/28) was higher than that of OLK (2.59%, 3/116), and no significant difference was found. There was only one case of smoke spot and statistical analysis was not carried out. ISH was used to detect type 16/18 and type 31/33 HPV DNA in 109 cases of oral mucosal lesions in paraffin sections and only one case of OSCC was HPV positive. Thirty-seven cases were detected by HC-II and ISH methods at the same time. The same negative results by the two methods were found in 94.6% samples (35/37). In the other two samples, one was OSCC with early infiltration and the other was OLK with hyperplasia, The HC-II results were positive while the ISH results were negative. The patients with OLP and HPV testing results were followed up and the average follow-up period was (36.2 ± 10.5) months. It was found that three of them had a malignant transformation, and the malignant transformation rate of HPV positive patients was 12.50% (1/8), which was higher than that of HPV negative patients (3.45%, 2/58), and the difference was not statistically significant, P=0.249.CONCLUSION:HC-II assay was more sensitive in detecting HPV infection of oral mucosal lesions than ISH. The results of this study showed that there was insufficient evidence for taking HPV infection as a predictor of OLK carcinogenesis. Patients suffering from OLP were in a precancerous condition. The prevalence of HPV in OLP patients of this study was higher than that in OLK and OSCC patients, suggesting that for some reason, OLP patients were susceptible to HPV. HPV testing can be considered as routine in patients with OLP, and HC-II assay was recommended. And patients with OLP and HPV positive should be followed up regularly.

Diffuse p16 Immunohistochemical Expression in Basaloid 'Human Papillomavirus-Like' Oral Epithelial Lesions May Not Be Human Papillomavirus-Associated

Expression of Human Papillomavirus and the p16 Gene in Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders (OPMD): a Comparative Study With Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Utility of p53 Immunohistochemistry in Diagnosis of Human Papillomavirus Associated Oral Epithelial Dysplasia: A Retrospective Study of 105 Patients

Consensus in Diagnosis and Classification of Oral Epithelial Dysplasia: A Comparative Analysis of H&E-Stained Sections with and without p53/p16 Immunohistochemistry

HPV-16 in a distinct subset of oral epithelial dysplasia

Analysis of clinicopathological features of human papilloma virus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Histologic Typing in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Genetic Mutation and Exosome Signature of Human Papilloma Virus Associated Oropharyngeal Cancer

Double demonstration of oncogenic high risk human papilloma virus DNA and HPV-E7 protein in oral cancers

Partial P16 Staining in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Extent and Pattern Correlate with Human Papillomavirus RNA Status

p16 overexpression identifies oncogenic high‐risk HPV infection in non‐oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Predicting HPV association using deep learning and regular H&E stains allows granular stratification of oropharyngeal cancer patients

Abnormal p53 Immunohistochemical Patterns Are Associated With Regional Lymph Node Metastasis In Oral Cavity Invasive Squamous Cell Carcinoma At Time Of Surgery

Association of human papilloma virus in oral squamous cell carcinoma: An alarming need for human papillomavirus 16 screening in cancer patients

Digital Spatial Profiling identifies distinct patterns of immuno-oncology-related gene expression within oropharyngeal tumours in relation to HPV and p16 status

Human papillomavirus-16 infection and p16 expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma

Abnormal p53 Immunohistochemical Patterns Are Associated with Regional Lymph Node Metastasis in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma at Time of Surgery

Evaluation of HPV and EBV in OSCC and the expression of p53, p16, E-cadherin, COX-2, MYC, and MLH1

[Relationship Between HPV-DNA Status and P16 Protein Expression in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Their Clinical Significance].

[Determination of Human Papillomavirus in Oral Leukoplakia,oral Lichen Planus and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma].

Expression of P53, Mdm2, P21, Heat Shock Protein 70, and Hpv 16/18 E6 Proteins in Oral Verrucous Carcinoma and Oral Verrucous Hyperplasia