The Pain Injustice Experience Questionnaire: Measurement Invariance Across Gender and Racial/Ethnic Minority Status
Shinye Kim,Yuki Shigemoto
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.s475808
IF: 2.8319
2024-09-19
Journal of Pain Research
Abstract:Shinye Kim, 1 Yuki Shigemoto 2 1 Department of Counseling Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA; 2 Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 3261, USA Correspondence: Shinye Kim, Department of Counseling Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 335B Education Building 1000, Bascom Mall, Madison, WI, 53706, USA, Email Understanding the complex interplay between psychosocial factors and chronic pain outcomes is pivotal in the development of effective pain management strategies. Among these factors, the perception of injustice related to pain stands out as a significant predictor of pain-related outcomes, influencing the severity of chronic pain, its impact on daily functioning, and the psychological distress associated with it. 1 The Injustice Experience Questionnaire (IEQ) emerges as a critical tool in this context, designed to capture the multifaceted nature of perceived injustice by evaluating the severity of injury, irreparability of loss, and associated blame. 1 This nuanced understanding of pain perception is crucial for tailoring treatment approaches that address not only the physical but also the psychological dimensions of chronic pain. Despite the acknowledged importance of perceived injustice in the realm of chronic pain, the literature reveals a gap in our understanding of how different demographic groups, specifically gender and racial/ethnic minorities (REM), experience and report these perceptions. Gender differences in the experience of perceived injustice have been documented, yet the evidence remains inconclusive regarding whether men or women report higher levels of injustice. 2 Furthermore, REM individuals, notably those identifying as Black, have been found to report greater levels of perceived injustice compared to their White and Hispanic counterparts, highlighting potential disparities in chronic pain care and the impact of systemic bias. 2 These discrepancies underscore the necessity of examining the measurement invariance of the IEQ across these demographic categories. Without confirming that the IEQ performs consistently across gender and REM status, there is a risk that differences observed in research findings might reflect measurement artifacts or biases inherent in the questionnaire's design rather than genuine differences in perceived injustice. Establishing measurement invariance is therefore essential to ensure that the IEQ can be reliably used to assess perceived injustice in diverse populations, thereby contributing to more equitable pain care by identifying and addressing the unique psychosocial needs of each demographic group. The current study aims to fill this critical gap by testing the measurement equivalence of the IEQ across gender and racial/ethnic minority status. This investigation is not only pivotal for validating the use of the IEQ in diverse populations but also holds significant implications for the development of targeted interventions. By ensuring that the IEQ accurately reflects the experiences of all individuals, regardless of gender or racial/ethnic background, researchers and clinicians can better understand the role of perceived injustice in chronic pain. This, in turn, facilitates the creation of more inclusive and effective pain management strategies, promoting improved outcomes and addressing the disparities currently observed in chronic pain care. This study on psychosocial functioning in chronic pain collected data via Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Participants were adults aged 20 to 75 years (mean age = 31.36, SD = 9.11), recruited from a diverse population of MTurk users. MTurk is an online platform that allows researchers to collect data from a broad and varied sample, including individuals from different age groups, ethnic backgrounds, and educational levels. 3,4 All participants reported experiencing chronic pain and met the inclusion criteria: being 18 years or older, having chronic pain, and correctly answering attention checks embedded in the survey. The final sample consisted of 316 participants, with 71% identifying as male and 29% as female. Additionally, 35% of the participants self-identified as White, and 65% as members of racial/ethnic minority groups, including Asian American, African American, Latina/o, Native American, Biracial, and Other. Participants completed a survey that assessed perceived injustice using the Injustice Experience Questionnaire (IEQ). The IEQ assesses perceived injustice through participants' appraisal of loss consequent to chronic pain that includes blame, sense of unfairness, and irreparability of loss. 1 Participants responded to items on a 5-point scale, with higher scores reflecting -Abstract Truncated-
clinical neurology