Multiplexed Superresolution CRISPR Imaging of Chromatin in Living Cells
Shaopeng Wang†,Yaya Hao,Luhao Zhang,Fei Wang,Jiang Li,Lihua Wang,Chunhai Fan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31635/10.31635/ccschem.019.20180035
2019-01-01
CCS Chemistry
Abstract:Open AccessCCS ChemistryRESEARCH ARTICLE1 Aug 2019Multiplexed Superresolution CRISPR Imaging of Chromatin in Living Cells Shaopeng Wang†, Yaya Hao†, Luhao Zhang, Fei Wang, Jiang Li, Lihua Wang and Chunhai Fan Shaopeng Wang† Division of Physical Biology and Bioimaging Center, Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility, CAS Key Laboratory of Interfacial Physics and Technology, Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800 (China) , Yaya Hao† School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, and Institute of Molecular Medicine, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240 (China) , Luhao Zhang Division of Physical Biology and Bioimaging Center, Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility, CAS Key Laboratory of Interfacial Physics and Technology, Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800 (China) , Fei Wang School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, and Institute of Molecular Medicine, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240 (China) , Jiang Li Division of Physical Biology and Bioimaging Center, Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility, CAS Key Laboratory of Interfacial Physics and Technology, Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800 (China) , Lihua Wang Division of Physical Biology and Bioimaging Center, Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility, CAS Key Laboratory of Interfacial Physics and Technology, Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800 (China) and Chunhai Fan *Corresponding author: E-mail Address: [email protected] School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, and Institute of Molecular Medicine, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240 (China) https://doi.org/10.31635/ccschem.019.20180035 SectionsSupplemental MaterialAboutAbstractPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail Visualization of the spatiotemporal organization of chromatin is highly desirable in the study of genome function regulations. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated endonuclease system has shown great promise for application in real-time chromatin imaging due to its DNA targeting ability in living cells. Previous studies typically used fluorescent proteins to generate fluorescent signals which, however, have trade-offs among signal intensity, multiplexibility, and simplicity. Here, we developed a CRISPR-based fluorescence probe for real-time imaging of chromatin in living cells. We demonstrated multicolor imaging of chromatin elements, including telomeres and major satellites with an approximately fivefold enhancement of the signal-to-background ratio. We also realized real-time monitoring of the dynamics of the target loci in living cells. The high brightness of this probe allowed sub-diffraction-limit imaging of telomeres, using a stimulated emission depletion microscopy. We concluded that our new CRISPR imaging system holds great potential for studying intracellular structures and functions with high spatiotemporal resolution. Download figure Download PowerPoint Introduction The spatiotemporally ordered organization of chromatin plays a significant role in genomic function regulations. Therefore, direct visualization of chromatin dynamics within a cell interphase nuclei with high-resolution imaging is highly desirable in genome study. Although high spatial resolution imaging of chromatin has been achieved by electron microscopy1,2 and fluorescence in situ hybridization,3–6 these methods usually require nonphysiological treatments such as cell fixation and DNA denaturation. Thus, they cannot reveal the dynamics of native chromatin in living cells with high temporal resolution.7 Recently, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated endonuclease (Cas) system has shown great promise in site-specific genetic modification,8–13 gene regulation,14 biosensing,2,15,16 biocomputing, and therapy.17 Particularly, the targeting ability of the CRISPR system provides a promising solution for chromatin visualization.12,18–30 For this purpose, nuclease-deficient Cas9 (dCas9) with single-guide RNA (sgRNA) are used as probes to target chromatin loci with protospacer adjacent motifs. Importantly, the CRISPR/dCas9 system can bind target DNA under physiological conditions, thereby enabling real-time tracking of chromatin loci in living cells. These CRISPR-based imaging strategies typically use fluorescence proteins (FPs) to generate fluorescence signals. However, they have trade-offs among brightness, multiplexibility, and simplicity. The most straightforward approach would have been to label dCas9 with FPs via genetic fusion or tagging.12,14,18,19,28 Nevertheless, to achieve multicolor imaging, multiple species of dCas9 fused with different colored FPs are used to orthogonally bind their corresponding sgRNA, which requires cumbersome construction and transfection of multiple vectors.19 Another technique applies sgRNA appended with aptamer motifs (e.g., MS2, PP7) to recruit FP-fused RNA-binding domains (e.g., tdMCP, tdPCP).20,21,24,31 Recent work has shown that this latter approach enables the assembly of as many as 24 FPs on a single sgRNA molecule with tandem MS2 motifs, which further improved the signal intensity of labeling, and therefore, realized visualization of single-copy loci in living cells.21 However, the dramatic extension of sgRNA and heavy loading of FPs may have negative effects on their binding affinity with dCas9 or target DNA.27 Additionally, the large size of the ribonucleoprotein complex with multiple FPs may also restrict their intracellular diffusion toward target sites (e.g., passing through nuclear pores) and limit the localization accuracy, especially, when used for superresolution (SR) imaging. Here, we report a novel fluorescence probe based on the well-characterized Streptococcus pyogenes CRISPR-Cas9 system for multiplexed SR chromatin imaging in living mouse embryonic fibroblast NIH 3T3 cells (scheme shown in Figure 1a). We used in vitro transcribed sgRNA molecules labeled with multiple chemical fluorophores to provide fluorescence signals. Compared with classic FPs, chemical fluorophores (e.g., Alexa Fluor) are smaller in size while possessing higher fluorescence brightness. With this system, we demonstrate multicolored imaging of chromatin elements with improved signal-to-background ratio and SR power. Figure 1 | Localization of chromatin loci in mammalian cells. (a) Schematic illustration of the fluorescent CRISPR probe for multiplexed chromatin imaging. (b) Microscopic images of target loci in NIH 3T3 cells. Upper row: imaging of telomeres; lower row: major satellites. Scale bar = 5 μm. (c) Fluorescence intensity profiles of the selected regions in different fluorescence channels from panel (b), normalized to the highest fluorescence intensity. Shaded area indicates the fluorescence background. Download figure Download PowerPoint Results and Discussion To construct our fluorescence probe system, we first synthesized chemical fluorophore-labeled sgRNA. DNA templates of the sgRNA were transcribed using T7 in vitro transcription kit (detailed in "Methods" section and ). Next, a ULYSIS nucleic acid labeling kit was used for fluorophore labeling of the sgRNA. Figure 1a illustrates the platinum-based chemistry of the labeling process. The chemical dyes (e.g., the Alexa Fluor dyes used in this study) labeled on the sgRNA have much smaller size/molecular weight and offers much higher fluorescence brightness, compared with FPs (see the comparison in ).32–35 According to the specification, guanine bases on the RNA strand can be labeled with a high probability, while adenines can be labeled with a lower probability. The invariable part of a typical sgRNA sequence (apart for the target recognition sequence) in this study contains 21 guanines and 27 adenines. Thus it is very likely that one sgRNA molecule could carry multiple fluorophores, similar to a fluorescent polymer with collective fluorescence enhancement. Meanwhile, this probe system sustains minimal size, compared with those carrying FPs. To validate the fluorescence-labeled sgRNA, we first tested their Cas9 binding ability via gel electrophoresis. The result (see ) shows that the gel mobility of the sgRNA-Alexa488 (A488) conjugate was largely retarded by the introduction of dCas9, resulting in structures with bright fluorescence staying in the sample well. This gel retardation is in accordance with the result from the unlabeled sgRNA, suggesting an effective binding between the fluorescent sgRNA and dCas9. Next, we applied this probe system for chromatin imaging in mammalian NIH 3T3 cells. We synthesized sgRNA targeting different chromatin loci, including telomeres (Telo-sgRNA) and major satellites (MaS-sgRNA) (detailed in "Methods" section) and labeled them with Alexa Fluor 647 dye (A647). We delivered them separately into NIH 3T3 cells stably expressing dCas9-enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP). The dCas9-EGFP carried a nuclear localization sequence that can guide the dCas9/sgRNA complex into the nucleus. Six hours after the transfection of Telo-sgRNA, we observed dozens of condensed, small-sized fluorescent spots (in the A647 channel) in the nucleus (Figure 1b), which almost perfectly overlapped (>95%; see ) with the fluorescence from the dCas9-EGFP. With the transfection of MaS-sgRNA, we observed larger sized A647 puncta in the nucleus, which also overlapped with the fluorescence from the dCas9-EGFP. These results indicate that the fluorescent sgRNA can indeed bind dCas9 proteins and be localized in the cell nucleus. The observed puncta patterns here are consistent with previously reported trends of telomeres and major satellites, suggesting successful localization of target loci. As we used liposomes to deliver the fluorescent sgRNA into cells, there were many fluorescence clusters distributed in the liposomal vesicles in the cytoplasm (see ). However, they showed little interference with the nucleus. Therefore, by simply deducting the fluorescence outside the cell nucleus and delimited with Hoechst staining, we could readily obtain clean images of the target loci as shown in Figure 1b. Of note, we found that the use of fluorescent sgRNA led to a high signal-to-background ratio. As shown in Figure 1b, the fluorescence of dCas9-EGFP shows apparent background fluorescence in the nontarget area, whereas the background fluorescence from the fluorescent sgRNA in the same area was much lower. The fluorescence profile of the selected regions (Figure 1c) verified that when normalized against the fluorescence of the target spots, the background fluorescence resulting from the fluorescent sgRNA was significantly lower than that from the dCas9-EGFP, suggesting that this sgRNA labeling system has a higher signal-to-background ratio (∼5-fold in some regions, as shown in Figure 1c), compared with the classic dCas9-EGFP labeling system. This feature may be attributed to the high brightness of fluorescent sgRNA. Besides, when sgRNA is not bound to a dCas9, it could hardly enter into the cell nucleus and adsorb on the chromatin DNA, thus leading to a lower background; whereas the dCas9 proteins free of sgRNA, effectively entered the cell nucleus (guided by the nuclear localization sequence) and nonspecifically adsorbed on the chromatin DNA (off-target effect), causing high background fluorescence. We also found that the colocalization of the fluorescent sgRNA and the dCas9 helped to improve further the specificity of target localization (i.e., suppressing false signals or backgrounds). As we can see from Figure 1b, the overlapping region of the sgRNA fluorescence and the dCas9 fluorescence shows marked reduction in background fluorescence (even to zero in some areas, as shown by the gray curves in Figure 1c). Indeed, with this probe system, different paths were employed for the sgRNA and dCas9 proteins delivery (i.e., the sgRNA were directly delivered with liposomes, while the dCas9 proteins were endogenously expressed). Thus path-dependent errors could be largely suppressed by cross-references, and the signal-to-background ratio could be further improved. To demonstrate the multiplexibility of this probe system, we simultaneously labeled different chromatin loci with corresponding sgRNA carrying different colored dyes (Figure 2a). We synthesized MaS-sgRNA labeled with A546 and Telo-sgRNA with A647. After they were cotransfected into dCas9-expressing cells, we observed large-sized fluorescent puncta representing the major satellites in the A546 channel and small-sized spots representing the telomeres in the A647 channel (Figure 2b). These fluorescence puncta almost perfectly match that from the EGFP-dCas9. Our results suggest that fluorescent sgRNA can be used for multiplexed imaging. Notably, the multiplexibility can be readily expanded by labeling the sgRNA with different colored fluorescence compounds, which is no longer restricted by the available number of orthogonal dCas9-sgRNA combinations or RNA aptamer–RNA-binding protein pairs. Moreover, this dual-color imaging strategy may also facilitate the quantitative analysis of target loci. It is known that the fluorescence intensity of a target element provides useful information about its status (e.g., structural condensation, number of repetitive units). However, the absolute fluorescence intensity can be affected by many external factors (e.g., probe transfection efficiency, photobleaching), which limit the precision of quantitative analysis. Here, owing to this dual-color strategy, we were able to compare the fluorescence from different targets, which enabled us to evaluate the origin of the fluorescence variation. Indeed, we found that after a 5 min excitation, the fluorescence of MaS and Telo descended synchronously (see ), suggesting that this change might attribute to photobleaching. Therefore, this dual-color strategy provides a reliable way to analyze the chromatin loci quantitatively. Figure 2 | Dual-color imaging of major satellites and telomeres. (a) Cartoon illustration and (b) confocal images of the dual-color imaging. Major satellites (purple) and telomeres (red) were labeled with different colored polyfluorophore sgRNA (MaS-sgRNA-Alexa546 and Telo-sgRNA-Alexa647), which colocalized with dCas9-EGFP (green). From upper left to lower right: 1, the channel of dCas9-EGFP; 2, the channel of MaS-sgRNA-Alexa546; 3, the channel of Telo-sgRNA-Alexa647; 4, merged image from 1 and 2; 5, merged image from 1, 2, and 3. Scale bar = 5 μm. Download figure Download PowerPoint We next aimed to monitor the real-time dynamics of chromatin loci in living NIH 3T3 cells. As shown in Figure 3, it was possible to continuously image the major satellites and telomeres in a living cell for 4 min (4 s per frame) and analyzed their moving trajectories (Figure 3b). We found that the mobility of telomeres was significantly higher than that of major satellites (Figure 3c), which is consistent with the fact that the terminal parts (telomeres) of the chromatin have higher freedom of motion, compared with the middle parts (major satellites). Meanwhile, the statistics of their moving directions (both telomeres and major satellites) showed no obvious directionality, suggesting their stochasticity movement property. These results demonstrate the capability of our strategy in visualizing the real-time dynamics of chromatin elements. Figure 3 | Real-time tracking of chromatin loci in living cells. (a) Time-stacked confocal images of major satellites (upper) and telomeres (lower). Scale bar = 5 μm. (b) Trajectories of the loci marked in panel (a). (c) Statistics of the moving distance of the target loci from panel (a). Download figure Download PowerPoint To achieve high spatial resolution imaging, we imaged telomeres using this system with custom-made, continuous wave stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscope.4,36,37 Here, Telo-sgRNA was labeled with Alexa488 (A488), which is effective for STED imaging, and was then transfected into dCas9-expressing NIH 3T3 cells. Six hours later, we observed many small-sized spots in the A488 channel under normal confocal mode (Figure 4), indicating the successful labeling of the telomeres. Next, SR images of telomeres were captured by the STED microscope (Figure 4a). Compared with the confocal image, the spot size of the telomeres was much smaller in the STED image. From the enlarged images (Figure 4b), we observed two discriminable fluorescence spots under the STED mode (Figure 4c), which highly overlapped under the confocal mode. We analyzed the fluorescence intensity distribution in the selected region of the STED image and found two separable point spread function peaks (shown as red and blue curves in Figure 4c) with a distance of ∼240 nm, indicating two telomeres. By contrast, there was only one fluorescence peak that could be found in the same region of the confocal image. Of note, the full width of half maximum of the point spread function of a telomere is ∼175 nm (Figure 4c), which is lower than the optical diffraction limit (200 nm), suggesting the sub-diffraction-limit resolution achieved by this system. Compared with other SR technologies such as photo-activated localization microscopy and stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy,38 STED microscopy has shown advantages in dynamic imaging and thick sample imaging.4,18–20,36–39 Notably, the resolution of STED is highly dependent on the fluorescence brightness of the targets. Thus this CRISPR probe system with its smaller size and enhanced brightness is suitable for subsequent STED imaging. We envisioned that this combination might have potential in high spatiotemporal resolution imaging of chromatin elements, which is essential for studies in fields, such as genome-wide genetic/epigenetic regulations, cell growth, differentiation, and oncogenesis. Figure 4 | Sub-diffraction-limit imaging of telomeres. (a) STED microscopic imaging of telomeres (right) compared with normal confocal imaging (left). Scale bar = 2.5 μm. (b) Enlarged images of the selected regions (yellow box) in panel (a). (c) Fluorescence intensity profiles (gray curve) of the selected regions (white box) in panel (b). The orange, red, and blue lines were the Gaussian fitting of the fluorescence intensity distribution. Download figure Download PowerPoint Methods Materials and cell culture All DNA oligonucleotides (high-performance liquid chromatography purified), DNA polymerase, and T7 in vitro transcription kits were purchased from Takara (Dalian, China). ULYSIS® Nucleic Acid Labeling Kits [Alexa 546 (A546), Alexa Fluor 647 (A647), Alexa 488 (A488)] and Lipofectamine 3000 were purchased from Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA, USA). The dCas9-EGFP plasmid was obtained from Addgene (Watertown, MA, USA). Phosphate-buffered saline was prepared with 137 mmol/L of NaCl, 2.7 mmol/L of KCl, 10 mmol/L of Na2HPO4, and 2 mmol/L of KH2PO4 (pH = 7.4). All solutions were prepared with deionized water. NIH 3T3 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, plus penicillin/streptomycin (100 units/mL) and l-glutamine (2 mM), at 37 °C in a humidified environment containing 5% CO2. In vitro transcription and labeling of sgRNA Different upstream DNA strands were annealed with the universal downstream template (see ) and elongated by DNA polymerase to obtain in vitro transcription templates for different target loci. Then different sgRNA were transcribed by T7 in vitro transcription kit, following the protocol provided by the manufacturer. For the labeling of sgRNA with different fluorescent dyes, specific nucleic acid labeling kits were used, following the protocol provided by the manufacturer. Briefly, sgRNA were precipitated and resuspended in the labeling buffer. Then 5 μL of labeling reagent was added into the solution, which was then incubated at 90 °C for 10 min. The reaction was stopped by plunging the reaction tube into an ice bath. Cell transfection Cells were seeded into cell culture plate overnight and transfected with 1 μg of dCas9-EGFP plasmid using Lipofectamine 3000. Cells were cultured for another 24 h and subsequently, transfected with 400 ng of sgRNA for 8 h to label the target loci. Imaging acquisition and processing After cells were stained with Hoechst 33258, images were captured with the Leica TCS SP8 laser scanning confocal microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). For real-time tracking, a living-cell imaging system on a confocal microscope was used, with 4 s time interval between two frames. The coordinates of the corresponding foci were localized by pixel representing the local maximum fluorescence intensity through ImageJ manual tracking algorithms. To remove fluorescence of the sgRNA in the cytoplasm, the fluorescence channel for Hoechst-stained cell nuclei was used to mask the channels for sgRNA. The fluorescence puncta of sgRNA outside the Hoechst-stained areas were then excluded using the MATLAB program. The overlapping images were obtained through an operation on the images from different channels using MATLAB. The fluorescence plot profiles of selected areas were obtained using ImageJ ( https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/). STED microscopic imaging The STED microscope was built based on an inverted confocal microscope as described previously.40 Briefly, a doughnut-shaped, continuous wave depletion beam with a wavelength of 592 nm was introduced into the microscope to superpose with the excitation beam (488 nm). The raw fluorescence intensity of the corresponding region was obtained from the software of the microscope. The curves were then fitted in OriginLab by Gaussian nonlinear curve fitting function. Y = y 0 + A w π 2 e − 2 ( x − x c ) 2 w 2 , where y0 is the offset, xc is the x value of the center, w is the width, and A is the area of the punctum. Conclusions We have developed a novel CRISPR/Cas9-based fluorescent probe system for chromatin imaging in living cells. Instead of using FPs, we strategically used chemical fluorophore-labeled sgRNA to generate fluorescent signals, which led to smaller size/low molecular weight probes with enhanced brightness. Based on this system, we demonstrated that target chromatin loci could be determined more accurately by the colocalization of dCas9 and these fluorescent sgRNAs, while the background fluorescence caused by the off-target dCas9 proteins is markedly suppressed. We also demonstrated the reliability of our probes in multicolor imaging for multiple targets by simply labeling different sgRNA with different colored fluorescent dyes. Thus the introduction of multiple species of dCas9/sgRNA to accomplish the same goal is no longer needed. This system can be readily extended to multi-color imaging as long as the chemical fluorophores are spectrally distinguishable under the microscope. We show that using dual-color imaging, the quantitative analysis of the target loci is more accurate. This strategy can also track the real-time dynamics of target genomic loci in living cells. Finally, sub-diffraction-limit imaging of telomeres could be achieved by using a combination of this system with STED microscopy. Therefore, we envisaged that this facile strategy holds potential in research areas involving chromatin imaging, nucleic acid analysis, and nanotechnology.41–43 Supporting Information The supporting information is available. Conflicts of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Acknowledgments This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFA0400900), National Natural Science Foundation of China (21775157, 21390414, 61475181, and U1632125), and Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (QYZDJ-SSW-SLH031). References 1. Eltsov M.; MacLellan K. M.; Maeshima K.; Frangakis A. S.; Dubochet J.Analysis of Cryo-Electron Microscopy Images Does Not Support the Existence of 30-nm Chromatin Fibers in Mitotic Chromosomes In Situ.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.2008, 105, 19732–19737. Google Scholar 2. Zuo X. L.; Fan C. H.; Chen H. Y.Biosensing CRISPR-Powered Diagnostics.Nat. Biomed. Eng.2017, 1, 0091. Google Scholar 3. Simonis M.; Klous P.; Splinter E.; Moshkin Y.; Willemsen R.; de Wit E.; van Steensel B.; de Laat W.Nuclear Organization of Active and Inactive Chromatin Domains Uncovered by Chromosome Conformation Capture-on-Chip (4C).Nat. Genet.2006, 38, 1348. Google Scholar 4. Wang S.; Deng S.; Cai X.; Hou S.; Li J.; Gao Z.; Li J.; Wang L.; Fan C.Superresolution Imaging of Telomeres With Continuous Wave Stimulated Emission Depletion (STED) Microscope.Sci. China Chem.2016, 59, 1519–1524. Google Scholar 5. Beliveau B. J.; Boettiger A. N.; Avendano M. S.; Jungmann R.; McCole R. B.; Joyce E. F.; Kim-Kiselak C.; Bantignies F.; Fonseka C. Y.; Erceg J.; Hannan M. A.; Hoang H. G.; Colognori D.; Lee J. T.; Shih W. M.; Yin P.; Zhuang X. W.; Wu C. T.Single-Molecule Super-Resolution Imaging of Chromosomes and In Situ Haplotype Visualization Using Oligopaint FISH Probes.Nat. Commun.2015, 6, 7147. Google Scholar 6. Boettiger A. N.; Bintu B.; Moffitt J. R.; Wang S.; Beliveau B. J.; Fudenberg G.; Imakaev M.; Mirny L. A.; Wu C. T.; Zhuang X.Super-Resolution Imaging Reveals Distinct Chromatin Folding for Different Epigenetic States.Nature2016, 529, 418–422. Google Scholar 7. Heng H. H. Q.; Squire J.; Tsui L. C.High-Resolution Mapping of Mammalian Genes by In Situ Hybridization to Free Chromatin.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1992, 89, 9509–9513. Google Scholar 8. Barrangou R.; Doudna J. A.Applications of CRISPR Technologies in Research and Beyond.Nat. Biotechnol.2016, 34, 933–941. Google Scholar 9. Babu M.; Beloglazova N.; Flick R.; Graham C.; Skarina T.; Nocek B.; Gagarinova A.; Pogoutse O.; Brown G.; Binkowski A.; Phanse S.; Joachimiak A.; Koonin E. V.; Savchenko A.; Emili A.; Greenblatt J.; Edwards A. M.; Yakunin A. F.A Dual Function of the CRISPR-Cas System in Bacterial Antivirus Immunity and DNA Repair.Mol. Microbiol.2011, 79, 484–502. Google Scholar 10. Jinek M.; Chylinski K.; Fonfara I.; Hauer M.; Doudna J. A.; Charpentier E.A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity.Science2012, 337, 816–821. Google Scholar 11. Wiedenheft B.; Sternberg S. H.; Doudna J. A.RNA-Guided Genetic Silencing Systems in Bacteria and Archaea.Nature2012, 482, 331–338. Google Scholar 12. Chen B.; Gilbert L. A.; Cimini B. A.; Schnitzbauer J.; Zhang W.; Li G. W.; Park J.; Blackburn E. H.; Weissman J. S.; Qi L. S.; Huang B.Dynamic Imaging of Genomic Loci in Living Human Cells by an Optimized CRISPR/Cas System.Cell2013, 155, 1479–1491. Google Scholar 13. Cong L.; Ran F. A.; Cox D.; Lin S. L.; Barretto R.; Habib N.; Hsu P. D.; Wu X. B.; Jiang W. Y.; Marraffini L. A.; Zhang F.Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems.Science2013, 339, 819–823. Google Scholar 14. Tanenbaum M. E.; Gilbert L. A.; Qi L. S.; Weissman J. S.; Vale R. D.A Protein-Tagging System for Signal Amplification in Gene Expression and Fluorescence Imaging.Cell2014, 159, 635–646. Google Scholar 15. Abudayyeh O. O.; Gootenberg J. S.; Essletzbichler P.; Han S.; Joung J.; Belanto J. J.; Verdine V.; Cox D. B. T.; Kellner M. J.; Regev A.; Lander E. S.; Voytas D. F.; Ting A. Y.; Zhang F.RNA Targeting with CRISPR–Cas13.Nature2017, 550, 280–284. Google Scholar 16. Gootenberg J. S.; Abudayyeh O. O.; Lee J. W.; Essletzbichler P.; Dy A. J.; Joung J.; Verdine V.; Donghia N.; Daringer N. M.; Freije C. A.; Myhrvold C.; Bhattacharyya R. P.; Livny J.; Regev A.; Koonin E. V.; Hung D. T.; Sabeti P. C.; Collins J. J.; Zhang F.Nucleic Acid Detection With CRISPR-Cas13a/C2 c2.Science2017, 356, 438–442. Google Scholar 17. Li J.; Green A. A.; Yan H.; Fan C.Engineering Nucleic Acid Structures for Programmable Molecular Circuitry and Intracellular Biocomputation.Nat. Chem.2017, 9, 1056–1067. Google Scholar 18. Zhou Y.; Wang P.; Tian F.; Gao G.; Huang L.; Wei W.; Xie X. S.Painting a Specific Chromosome With CRISPR/Cas9 for Live-Cell Imaging.Cell Res.2017, 27, 298–301. Google Scholar 19. Ma H.; Naseri A.; Reyes-Gutierrez P.; Wolfe S. A.; Zhang S.; Pederson T.Multicolor CRISPR Labeling of Chromosomal Loci in Human Cells.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.2015, 112, 3002–3007. Google Scholar 20. Ma H.; Tu L.; Naseri A.; Huisman M.; Zhang S.; Grunwald D.; Pederson T.Multiplexed Labeling of Genomic Loci With dCas9 and Engineered sgRNAs Using CRISPRainbow.Nat. Biotechnol.2016, 34, 528–530. Google Scholar 21. Qin P.; Parlak M.; Kuscu C.; Bandaria J.; Mir M.; Szlachta K.; Singh R.; Darzacq X.; Yildiz A.; Adli M.Live Cell Imaging of Low- and Non-Repetitive Chromosome Loci Using CRISPR-Cas9.Nat. Commun.2017, 8, 14725. Google Scholar 22. Wright A. V.; Nunez J. K.; Doudna J. A.Biology and Applications of CRISPR Systems: Harnessing Nature's Toolbox for Genome Engineering.Cell2016, 164, 29–44. Google Scholar 23. Zhang Y.; Cui Z.; Kong H.; Xia K.; Pan L.; Li J.; Sun Y.; Shi J.; Wang L.; Zhu Y.; Fan C.One-Shot Immunomodulatory Nanodiamond Agents for Cancer Immunotherapy.Adv. Mater.2016, 28, 2699–2708. Google Scholar 24. Shao S.; Zhang W.; Hu H.; Xue B.; Qin J.; Sun C.; Sun Y.; Wei W.; Sun Y.Long-Term Dual-Color Tracking of Genomic Loci by Modified sgRNAs of the CRISPR/Cas9 System.Nucleic Acids Res.2016, 44, e86. Google Scholar 25. Nowak C. M.; Lawson S.; Zerez M.; Bleris L.Guide RNA Engineering for Versatile Cas9 Functionality.Nucleic Acids Res.2016, 44, 9555–9564. Google Scholar 26. Jiang D.; Sun Y.; Li J.; Li Q.; Lv M.; Zhu B.; Tian T.; Cheng D.; Xia J.; Zhang L.; Wang L.; Huang Q.; Shi J.; Fan C.Multiple-Armed Tetrahedral DNA Nanostructures for Tumor-Targeting, Dual-Modality In Vivo Imaging.ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces2016, 8, 4378–4384. Google Scholar 27. Shechner D. M.; Hacisuleyman E.; Younger S. T.; Rinn J. L.Multiplexable, Locus-Specific Targeting of Long RNAs With CRISPR-Display.Nat. Methods2015, 12, 664–670. Google Scholar 28. Deng W.; Shi X.; Tjian R.; Lionnet T.; Singer R. H.CASFISH: CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated In Situ Labeling of Genomic Loci in Fixed Cells.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.2015, 112, 11870–11875. Google Scholar 29. Yan M.; Zhou S. R.; Xue H. W.CRISPR Primer Designer: Design Primers for Knockout and Chromosome Imaging CRISPR-Cas System.J. Integr. Plant Biol.2014, 57, 613–617. Google Scholar 30. Chen B.; Huang B.Imaging Genomic Elements in Living Cells Using CRISPR/Cas9.Methods Enzymol.2014, 546, 337–354. Google Scholar 31. Wang S. Y.; Su J. H.; Zhang F.; Zhuang X. W.An RNA-Aptamer-Based Two-Color CRISPR Labeling System.Sci. Rep.2016, 6, 26857. Google Scholar 32. Shaner N. C.; Steinbach P. A.; Tsien R. Y.A Guide to Choosing Fluorescent Proteins.Nat. Methods2005, 2, 905–909. Google Scholar 33. Patterson G. H.; Knobel S. M.; Sharif W. D.; Kain S. R.; Piston D. W.Use of the Green Fluorescent Protein and its Mutants in Quantitative Fluorescence Microscopy.Biophys. J.1997, 73, 2782–2790. Google Scholar 34. Panchuk-Voloshina N.; Haugland R. P.; Bishop-Stewart J.; Bhalgat M. K.; Millard P. J.; Mao F.; Leung W. Y.; Haugland R. P.Alexa Dyes, a Series of New Fluorescent Dyes that Yield Exceptionally Bright, Photostable Conjugates.J. Histochem. Cytochem.1999, 47, 1179–1188. Google Scholar 35. Berlier J. E.; Rothe A.; Buller G.; Bradford J.; Gray D. R.; Filanoski B. J.; Telford W. G.; Yue S.; Liu J. X.; Cheung C. Y.; Chang W.; Hirsch J. D.; Beechem J. M.; Haugland R. P.; Haugland R. P.Quantitative Comparison of Long-Wavelength Alexa Fluor Dyes to Cy Dyes: Fluorescence of the Dyes and Their Bioconjugates.J. Histochem. Cytochem.2003, 51, 1699–1712. Google Scholar 36. Gao Z.; Deng S.; Li J.; Wang K.; Li J.; Wang L.; Fan C.Sub-Diffraction-Limit Cell Imaging Using a Super-Resolution Microscope With Simplified Pulse Synchronization.Sci. China Chem.2017, 60, 1305–1309. Google Scholar 37. Hou S.; Liang L.; Deng S.; Chen J.; Huang Q.; Cheng Y.; Fan C.Nanoprobes for Super-Resolution Fluorescence Imaging at the Nanoscale.Sci. China Chem.2014, 57, 100–106. Google Scholar 38. Huang B.; Babcock H.; Zhuang X. W.Breaking the Diffraction Barrier: Super-Resolution Imaging of Cells.Cell2010, 143, 1047–1058. Google Scholar 39. Eggeling C.; Ringemann C.; Medda R.; Schwarzmann G.; Sandhoff K.; Polyakova S.; Belov V. N.; Hein B.; von Middendorff C.; Schonle A.; Hell S. W.Direct Observation of the Nanoscale Dynamics of Membrane Lipids in a Living Cell.Nature2009, 457, 1159–1163. Google Scholar 40. Du J.; Deng S.; Hou S.; Qiao L.; Chen J.; Huang Q.; Fan C.; Cheng Y.; Zhao Y.Superresolution Imaging of DNA Tetrahedral Nanostructures in Cells by STED Method With Continuous Wave Lasers.Chin. Opt. Lett.2014, 12, 041101. Google Scholar 41. Lin M. H.; Wang J. J.; Zhou G. B.; Wang J. B.; Wu N.; Lu J. X.; Gao J. M.; Chen X. Q.; Shi J. Y.; Zuo X. L.; Fan C. H.Programmable Engineering of a Biosensing Interface With Tetrahedral DNA Nanostructures for Ultrasensitive DNA Detection.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.2015, 54, 2151–2155. Google Scholar 42. Wen Y. L.; Pei H.; Shen Y.; Xi J. J.; Lin M. H.; Lu N.; Shen X. Z.; Li J.; Fan C. H.DNA Nanostructure-Based Interfacial Engineering for PCR-Free Ultrasensitive Electrochemical Analysis of MicroRNA.Sci. Rep.2012, 2, 867. Google Scholar 43. He Y.; Zhong Y. L.; Su Y. Y.; Lu Y. M.; Jiang Z. Y.; Peng F.; Xu T. T.; Su S.; Huang Q.; Fan C. H.; Lee S. T.Water-Dispersed Near-Infrared-Emitting Quantum Dots of Ultrasmall Sizes for In Vitro and In Vivo Imaging.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.2011, 50, 5694–5697. Google Scholar Previous articleNext article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited bySong W, Song Z, Li Q, Shang C, Chao Q, Liu X, Kong R, Fan G and Luo X (2022) A Cell-Anchored and Self-Calibrated DNA Nanoplatform for in Situ Imaging and Quantification of Endogenous MicroRNA in Live Cells: Introducing Two Controls to Normalize the Sensing Signals, CCS Chemistry, 5:1, (176-190), Online publication date: 10-Jan-2023. Issue AssignmentVolume 1Issue 3Page: 278-285Supporting Information Copyright & Permissions© 2019 Chinese Chemical SocietyKeywordsCRISPRchromatin imagingmulticolorcell imagingsuperresolutionAcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFA0400900), National Natural Science Foundation of China (21775157, 21390414, 61475181, and U1632125), and Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (QYZDJ-SSW-SLH031). Downloaded 2,750 times PDF downloadLoading ...