Abstract:Although Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations are still the dominant tool for engineering design and analysis applications involving turbulent flows, standard RANS models are known to be unreliable in many flows of engineering relevance, including flows with separation, strong pressure gradients or mean flow curvature. With increasing amounts of 3-dimensional experimental data and high fidelity simulation data from Large Eddy Simulation (LES) and Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS), data-driven turbulence modeling has become a promising approach to increase the predictive capability of RANS simulations. However, the prediction performance of data-driven models inevitably depends on the choices of training flows. This work aims to identify a quantitative measure for a priori estimation of prediction confidence in data-driven turbulence modeling. This measure represents the distance in feature space between the training flows and the flow to be predicted. Specifically, the Mahalanobis distance and the kernel density estimation (KDE) technique are used as metrics to quantify the distance between flow data sets in feature space. To examine the relationship between these two extrapolation metrics and the machine learning model prediction performance, the flow over periodic hills at Re = 10595 is used as test set and seven flows with different configurations are individually used as training sets. The results show that the prediction error of the Reynolds stress anisotropy is positively correlated with Mahalanobis distance and KDE distance, demonstrating that both extrapolation metrics can be used to estimate the prediction confidence a priori . A quantitative comparison using correlation coefficients shows that the Mahalanobis distance is less accurate in estimating the prediction confidence than KDE distance. The extrapolation metrics introduced in this work and the corresponding analysis provide an approach to aid in the choice of data source and to assess the prediction performance for data-driven turbulence modeling.

Low Cost Recurrent and Asymptotically Unbiased Estimators of Statistical Uncertainty on Averaged Fields for DNS and LES

Motion Estimation under Location Uncertainty for Turbulent Fluid Flows

Quantifying Uncertainties in Direct-Numerical-simulation Statistics Due to Wall-Normal Numerics and Grids

Uncertainty Quantification in Computational Fluid Dynamics: Physics and Machine Learning Based Approaches

In-situ Estimation of Time-averaging Uncertainties in Turbulent Flow Simulations

Quantifying and Reducing Model-Form Uncertainties in Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes Simulations: A Data-Driven, Physics-Informed Bayesian Approach

Uncertainty Quantification of the time averaging of a Statistics Computed from Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Flow

Spatial Flow-Field Approximation Using Few Thermodynamic Measurements Part II: Uncertainty Assessments

Computing Mean Fields with Known Reynolds Stresses at Steady State

Numerical and modeling error assessment of large-eddy simulation using direct-numerical-simulation-aided large-eddy simulation

A Deep Learning Approach For Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification Of Turbulent Flow Simulations

Uncertainty quantification of large-eddy simulation results of riverine flows: a field and numerical study

Large/small eddy simulations: A high-fidelity method for studying high-Reynolds number turbulent flows

A Priori Assessment of Prediction Confidence for Data-Driven Turbulence Modeling

Is a direct numerical simulation (DNS) of Navier-Stokes equations with small enough grid spacing and time-step definitely reliable/correct?

Procedure for Estimation and Reporting of Uncertainty Due to Discretization in CFD Applications

Physics Based & Machine Learning Methods For Uncertainty Estimation In Turbulence Modeling

Decomposition of Uncertainty Sources in Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler Streamflow Measurements Using Repeated Measures Experiments

Chilled Sampling for Uncertainty Quantification: A Motivation From A Meteorological Inverse Problem

A Multi-Fidelity Uncertainty Propagation Model for Multi-Dimensional Correlated Flow Field Responses

Uncertainty Quantification of Water Distribution System Measurement Data based on a Least Squares Loop Flows State Estimator