Abstract:The shape of fish scales is, to a considerable degree, species-specific, making it possible to identify species using only one fish scale per specimen. However, to our knowledge, the shape of the rhombic lamination pattern has not been considered to identify species. This study used landmarks and geometric morphometric approaches to address two questions: (1) whether the rhombic lamination pattern of fish scales along the longitudinal axis varies within species and sex and (2) how many fish scales of the rhombic squamation pattern should be considered to obtain an adequate identification. These questions were assessed with a MANCOVA and a cross-validated quadratic discriminant analysis (DA) using the rhombus of one, three, and six scales, and 6, 14, and 26 landmarks, respectively, in order to discriminate between two co-generic species, Mugil cephalus and Mugil curema. Proportions of the total shape variance explained by the total length and the centroid size were 2.3, 11.8, and 10.5% and 4.2, 5.1, and 5.4% for one, three, and six scales, respectively. Thus, analyses were performed on the shape and the form (shape plus size). The MANCOVA and DA analyses were found to be effective in detecting differences in scale pattern shape between species (except in the case of three scales; p = 0.079 for the shape and p = 0.065 for the form), whereas no differences were recorded between size and sex in all cases. Findings indicate that a good identification of species is possible, with no significant differences when using shape or form. The DA provided values of 75.8, 75.0, and 73.4% based on the shape, and of 72.7, 75.8, and 75.0% based on the form, for 1, 3 and 6 scales, respectively. Thus, it is possible to obtain a rapid and reliable identification of species using the rhombus of one scale only without considering the size. This is a useful finding in practical terms since scaling requires data on length. The finding of a suitable discrimination using only the rhombus of one scale raises the possibility of using an ocular adaptor on a camera or mobile phone, allowing many individuals to be easily screened without having to collect scales.

Identifying fish scales: The influence of allometry on scale shape and classification

New Insights into Geometric Morphometry Applied to Fish Scales for Species Identification

Fish Species Identification Using the Rhombic Squamation Pattern

Geometric morphometric analysis of fish scales for identifying genera, species, and local populations within the Mugilidae

Impact of environmental and genetic factors on the scale shape of zebrafish, Danio rerio (Hamilton 1822): a geometric morphometric study

Freshwater fish scale database

Form and performance: body shape and prey-capture success in four drift-feeding minnows

Unravelling the stock structure of the Persian brown trout by otolith and scale shape

Scale Characteristics of Six Fish Species of the Genus Cyprinion (Teleostei: Cypriniformes): A Microscopic Analysis

Ontogenetic allometry of the bluemouth, Helicolenus dactylopterus dactylopterus (Teleostei: Scorpaenidae), in the Northeast Atlantic and Mediterranean based on geometric morphometrics

Allometric changes and shape differentiation of sagitta otoliths in sciaenid fishes

Predicting the slope of the allometric scaling of consumption rates in fish using the physiology of growth

Evaluation of removal of the size effect using data scaling and elliptic Fourier descriptors in otolith shape analysis, exemplified by the discrimination of two yellow croaker stocks along the Chinese coast

Effects of scale on the assessment of fish biodiversity in the marine strategy framework directive context

Discriminating Scleromystax barbatus (Siluriformes: Callichthyidae) populations from Atlantic Rainforest streams employing otolith shape

Fish scale shape follows predictable patterns of variation based on water column position, body size, and phylogeny

Testing otolith morphology for measuring marine fish biodiversity

Growing out of the fins: Implications of isometric and allometric scaling of morphology relative to increasing mass in blue sharks (Prionace glauca)

Allometric growth and sperm competition in fishes

Geometric morphometric analysis of Pleuronectiformes vertebrae: A new tool to identify archaeological fish remains?

Comparing geometric morphometrics and outline fitting methods to monitor fish shape variability of Diplodus puntazzo (Teleostea: Sparidae)