Entrepreneuring as provocation and its critical capacity: problematizing and establishing meanings of entrepreneurship

Patrick GregoriDepartment of Innovation Management and Entrepreneurship,University of Klagenfurt,Klagenfurt,Austria
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2024.2335617
IF: 6.408
2024-03-30
Entrepreneurship and Regional Development
Abstract:Entrepreneurship is an elusive phenomenon and its meaning has been vigorously debated. This study seeks to contribute to critical perspectives on entrepreneurship by investigating how entrepreneuring participates and intervenes in the dominant discourse, and thus, in the practices that constitute meaning. To explore this crucial question, I use the framework of entrepreneuring as a mode of critical engagement. This perspective is supplemented by the performative notion of provocation, which helps in conceptualizing entrepreneuring and its artefacts as critical participants of the discourse. Next, I build a case around a video game as an artefact produced by an entrepreneurial venture. The findings reveal three practices that emerge from entrepreneuring: caricaturing, metaphorizing, and devaluing. I develop a model that illustrates how entrepreneuring provokes (i.e. problematizes and establishes) different versions of entrepreneurship. This study contributes to entrepreneuring and its critical capacity by theorizing entrepreneuring as provocation. Provocation highlights the various practices of critical engagement, draws attention to the involved material artefacts, and informs our understanding of the implicated ethics.
business,development studies
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper primarily explores how entrepreneurial activities participate in and intervene in the mainstream entrepreneurial discourse, thereby constructing different meanings of entrepreneurship. The author investigates this issue by analyzing a video game called "Going Under." This game, developed by the startup Aggro Crab, satirically depicts the cultural and economic phenomena of high-tech, high-growth, and venture capital-backed startups. Specifically, the study finds that entrepreneurial activities participate in and intervene in the mainstream entrepreneurial discourse through the following three practices: 1. **Caricaturing**: Presenting certain entrepreneurial phenomena or figures in an exaggerated form to highlight their absurdity. 2. **Metaphorizing**: Using metaphors to describe entrepreneurial phenomena to reveal their deeper meanings. 3. **Devaluing**: Criticizing certain entrepreneurial behaviors or models by devaluing their worth, thereby highlighting their potential negative impacts on society. The author constructs a model demonstrating how these practices prompt people to question mainstream entrepreneurial concepts and build new understandings based on this foundation. This study not only deepens our understanding of the critical capacity of entrepreneurial activities but also emphasizes the ethical issues involved in constructing the meaning of entrepreneurship.