The challenge of standardizing CAR‐T cell monitoring: A comparison of two flow‐cytometry methods and correlation with qPCR technique

Juan Luis Valdivieso‐Shephard,Elisabet Matas‐Pérez,Silvia García‐Bujalance,Isabel Mirones‐Aguilar,Berta González‐Martínez,Antonio Pérez‐Martínez,Eduardo López‐Granados,Ana Martínez‐Feito,Elena Sánchez‐Zapardiel,Juan Luis Valdivieso Shephard,Elisabet Matas Pérez,Silvia García Bujalance,Isabel Mirones Aguilar,Berta González Martínez,Antonio Pérez Martínez,Eduardo López Granados,Ana Martínez Feito,Elena Sánchez Zapardiel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.24825
IF: 4.714
2024-02-09
Cytometry Part A
Abstract:Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T‐cell therapy is a breakthrough in hematologic malignancies, such as acute B lymphoblastic leukemia (B‐ALL). Monitoring this treatment is recommended, although standardized protocols have not been developed yet. This work compares two flow cytometry monitoring strategies and correlates this technique with qPCR method. CAR‐T cells were detected by two different flow‐cytometry protocols (A and B) in nine blood samples from one healthy donor and five B‐ALL patients treated with Tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah®, USA). HIV‐1 viral load allowed CAR detection by qPCR, using samples from seven healthy donors and nine B‐ALL patients. CAR detection by protocol A and B did not yield statistically significant differences (1.9% vs. 11.8% CD3 + CAR+, p = 0.07). However, protocol B showed a better discrimination of the CD3 + CAR+ population. A strong correlation was observed between protocol B and qPCR (r = 0.7, p
cell biology,biochemical research methods
What problem does this paper attempt to address?