Abstract:Machine learning (ML) applications in Earth and environmental sciences (EES) have gained incredible momentum in recent years. However, these ML applications have largely evolved in ‘isolation’ from the mechanistic, process‐based modelling (PBM) paradigms, which have historically been the cornerstone of scientific discovery and policy support. In this perspective, we assert that the cultural barriers between the ML and PBM communities limit the potential of ML, and even its ‘hybridization’ with PBM, for EES applications. Fundamental, but often ignored, differences between ML and PBM are discussed as well as their strengths and weaknesses in light of three overarching modelling objectives in EES, (1) nowcasting and prediction, (2) scenario analysis, and (3) diagnostic learning. The paper ponders over a ‘coevolutionary’ approach to model building, shifting away from a borrowing to a co‐creation culture, to develop a generation of models that leverage the unique strengths of ML such as scalability to big data and high‐dimensional mapping, while remaining faithful to process‐based knowledge base and principles of model explainability and interpretability, and therefore, falsifiability. In this perspective, we assert that the cultural barriers between the machine learning (ML) and process‐based modelling (PBM) communities limit the potential of ML, and even its ‘hybridization’ with PBM, for EES applications. We ponders over a ‘coevolutionary’ approach to model building, shifting away from a borrowing to a co‐creation culture, to develop a generation of models that leverage the unique strengths of ML such as scalability to big data and high‐dimensional mapping, while remaining faithful to process‐based knowledge base and principles of model explainability and interpretability, and therefore, falsifiability.

Perspectives on Advancing Multimodal Learning in Environmental Science and Engineering Studies

Machine Learning: New Ideas and Tools in Environmental Science and Engineering

Data-Driven Machine Learning in Environmental Pollution: Gains and Problems

Multimodal Methods for Analyzing Learning and Training Environments: A Systematic Literature Review

Perspectives on learning with multimodal technology

Multimodal Machine Learning Guides Low Carbon Aeration Strategies in Urban Wastewater Treatment

Coevolution of machine learning and process‐based modelling to revolutionize Earth and environmental sciences: A perspective

A new ChatGPT-empowered, easy-to-use machine learning paradigm for environmental science

Data Analytics for Environmental Science and Engineering Research

Foundations & Trends in Multimodal Machine Learning: Principles, Challenges, and Open Questions

Multi-modal Machine Learning in Engineering Design: A Review and Future Directions

Foundations and Trends in Multimodal Machine Learning: Principles, Challenges, and Open Questions

Challenges in data-based geospatial modeling for environmental research and practice

LITE: Modeling Environmental Ecosystems with Multimodal Large Language Models

More Diverse Means Better: Multimodal Deep Learning Meets Remote Sensing Imagery Classification

Integrating Scientific Knowledge with Machine Learning for Engineering and Environmental Systems

Advances and applications of machine learning and deep learning in environmental ecology and health

Potential Application of Machine-Learning-Based Quantum Chemical Methods in Environmental Chemistry

From Pixels to Prose: Advancing Multi-Modal Language Models for Remote Sensing

Data-Driven Sustainability: Leveraging Big Data and Machine Learning to Build a Greener Future

Vision+X: A Survey on Multimodal Learning in the Light of Data