Abstract:We develop a double-sided moral hazard model of social entrepreneurship and derive the optimal state subsidy. Then, we analyze the data of an EU-funded training and mentoring program aiming at preparing social entrepreneurs for private financing. Using content analysis techniques, we investigate the 203 applications for the program, the reviewers' evaluation, and the selection decision. Social enterprises produce private and public benefits, use market and non-market resources, and involve a wide range of stakeholders with different incentives. We examine why different projects can get active financing (financing plus advisory), or only passive financing (financing without advisory), or no financing at all. We identify five relevant selection criteria such as entrepreneurial net present value, entrepreneurial agency cost, advisory net present value, advisory agency cost, and the external effects of the project. Empirical findings are consistent with the theoretical model. Applicants with higher scores in business plan, social impact, and geographical scope were significantly more likely to be selected, especially if their activities required no domain-specific knowledge from the advisors. However, higher agency costs, reflected in too many business lines and early-stage operations, seem to reduce the chances significantly. We formulate a moral hazard model for social entrepreneurship with four simultaneously optimizing players: an entrepreneur, an investor, an advisor, and the state. With the help of our unique database, we get valuable insights into the financing decisions of a profit-seeking investor. Our findings can contribute to the improvement of the design of state-subsidized social entrepreneurship programs.

Social enterprise, renewable energy, and cap-and-trade under sustainable insurance

Borrowing-firm environmental impact on insurer green finance assessment: Green loan subsidy, regulatory cap, and green technology

Cap-and-trade mechanisms, green technology investment, and shadow insurance in a black swan environment

Green technology choices under the cap-and-trade mechanism with insurer green finance in a dragon-king environment

Carbon leakage perspective: Unveiling policy dilemmas in emission trading and carbon tariffs under insurer green finance

Life insurance policyholder protection, government green subsidy, and cap-and-trade transactions in a black swan environment

Green insurance, technology insurance, and corporate green innovation

Social Enterprise Under Moral Hazard: Who Gets State Subsidies and Active Financing?

Multi-stage dynamic evolution of green financial system from the perspective of bilateral moral hazard

Effects of Cap-and-Trade Mechanism and Financial Gray Rhino Threats on Insurer Performance

Evolutionary game and simulation analysis of enterprise's green technology innovation under green credit policy: evidence from China

Energy transition: Cap-and-trade and carbon capture and storage for achieving net-zero emissions with sustainable insurance

Green finance, loan commitment, and environmental corporate social responsibility in a differentiated duopoly

Transformational insurance and green credit incentive policies as financial mechanisms for green energy transitions and low-carbon economic development

Environmental liability insurance, green innovation, and mediation effect study

International climate policy dilemmas: Examining effective carbon tariff and cap-and-trade regulation from a sustainable insurance perspective

Improving the greenness of enterprise supply chains by designing government subsidy mechanisms: based on prospect theory and evolutionary games

Analysis of subsidy strategy for sustainable development of environmental protection policy

Environmental pollution liability insurance and commercial credit financing

Operational decisions of green supply chain under financial incentives with emission constraints

Implementation of enterprises' green technology innovation under market-based environmental regulation: An evolutionary game approach