Abstract:Background: Health inequalities are rooted in historically unjust differences in economic opportunities, environment, access to health care services, and other social determinants. Owing to these health inequalities, the COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately affected underserved populations, notably people of color, incarcerated and formerly incarcerated individuals, and those unable to physically distance themselves from others. However, people most strongly impacted by health disparities, and the pandemic, are not frequently engaged in research, either as researchers or as participants, resulting in slow progress toward improving health equity. Establishing ways to foster the engagement of historically excluded people is crucial to improving health equity through patient-centered health research. Objective: This study aimed to assess the use of equity-centered design thinking (EDT) for engaging community members in research prioritization related to COVID-19. The co-design methods and subsequent production of a toolkit that can be used for engagement were assessed through process evaluation and qualitative methods. Methods: Process evaluation and qualitative inquiry, using reflexive thematic analysis, were undertaken to examine the use of EDT. Patient community members and stakeholders remotely partnered with design and health researchers in a year-long digital process to cocreate capacity-building tools for setting agenda for research regarding the impact of COVID-19 on health outcomes. Through a series of 3 workshops, 5 community partners engaged in EDT activities to identify critical challenges for the health and well-being of their communities. The subsequent tools were tested with 10 health researchers who provided critical input over the course of 2 workshops. Interviews with co-designers, project materials, and feedback sessions were used in the process evaluation and finalization of an equity-centered toolkit for community engagement in research. Data from the co-design process, meetings, workshops, and interviews were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis to identify salient themes. Results: Process evaluation illustrated how the EDT co-design process offered an approach to engage patient partners and community stakeholders in health-related research around COVID-19. The participants expressed satisfaction with design thinking approaches, including creative activities and iterative co-design, as a means of working together. Thematic analysis identified 3 key themes: the value of authentic partnerships, building trust and empathy through design, and fostering candid dialogue around health and social issues impacting historically underrepresented and underinvested communities. Conclusions: The project addressed the need to test EDT strategies for fostering inclusive community engagement in health research agenda setting and provided an alternative to traditional top-down models. Despite the increasing use of human-centered design in health, few projects explicitly include equity in design thinking approaches. The use of methods and tools to intentionally engage underrepresented stakeholders in the process of research agenda setting and equitably sharing power between researchers and community members may improve health research, ultimately improving health equity.

Designathons in health research: a global systematic review

A Conference Designathon to Spark Innovation: Actionable Ideas to Enhance STD Control

Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews

Fostering innovation and sustainable thinking in surgery: an evaluation of a surgical hackathon

A Public Health Hackathon For Medical Students In Africa: Process, Outcome And Recommendations

Co-design of digital health interventions with young people: A scoping review

Is hackathon in oncology a plausible way to foster innovation? An experiential narrative account of conducting Hacking Cancer

A rapid review of digital approaches for the participatory development of health-related interventions

Digital Health Intervention Design and Deployment for Engaging Demographic Groups Likely to Be Affected by the Digital Divide: Protocol for a Systematic Scoping Review

Evaluating a novel approach to stimulate open science collaborations: a case series of “study-a-thon” events within the OHDSI and European IMI communities

Institutionalizing healthcare hackathons to promote diversity in collaboration in medicine

A modified stakeholder participation assessment framework for design thinking in health innovation

Catching lightning in a bottle: the STI and HIV 2023 World Congress Participatory Designathon

Design thinking to improve implementation of public health interventions: an exploratory case study on enhancing park use

A review of research with co-design methods in health education

Improving the Engagement of Underrepresented People in Health Research Through Equity-Centered Design Thinking: Qualitative Study and Process Evaluation for the Development of the Grounding Health Research in Design Toolkit

Co-design of Digital Health Interventions for Young Adults: Protocol for a Scoping Review

The Application of Human-Centered Design Approaches in Health Research and Innovation: A Narrative Review of Current Practices

Co-design of health educational materials with people experiencing homelessness and support workers: a scoping review

A qualitative review of the design thinking framework in health professions education

Human factors applications in the design of decision support systems for population health: a scoping review