Antisense RNA Interference-Enhanced CRISPR/Cas9 Base Editing Method for Improving Base Editing Efficiency in Streptomyces lividans 66

Yue Zhang,Kaiyue Yun,Huamei Huang,Ran Tu,Erbing Hua,Meng Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.0c00563
IF: 5.249
2021-03-15
ACS Synthetic Biology
Abstract:CRISPR/Cas9-mediated base editors, based on cytidine deaminase or adenosine deaminase, are emerging genetic technologies that facilitate genomic manipulation in many organisms. Since base editing is free from DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), it has certain advantages, such as a lower toxicity, compared to the traditional DSB-based genome engineering technologies. In terms of <i>Streptomyces</i>, a base editing method has been successfully applied in several model and non-model species, such as <i>Streptomyces coelicolor</i> and <i>Streptomyces griseofuscus</i>. In this study, we first proved that BE2 (rAPOBEC1-dCas9-UGI) and BE3 (rAPOBEC1-nCas9-UGI) were functional base editing tools in <i>Streptomyces lividans</i> 66, albeit with a much lower editing efficiency compared to that of <i>S. coelicolor</i>. Uracil generated in deamination is a key intermediate in the base editing process, and it can be hydrolyzed by uracil DNA glycosidase (UDG) involved in the intracellular base excision repair, resulting in a low base editing efficiency. By knocking out two endogenous UDGs (UDG1 and UDG2), we managed to improve the base editing efficiency by 3.4–67.4-fold among different loci. However, the inactivation of UDG is detrimental to the genome stability and future application of engineered strains. Therefore, we finally developed <u class="uu">a</u>nti<u class="uu">s</u>ense <u class="uu">RNA</u> interference-enhanced CRISPR/Cas9 <u class="uu">B</u>ase <u class="uu">E</u>diting method (asRNA-BE) to transiently disrupt the expression of uracil DNA glycosidases during base editing, leading to a 2.8–65.8-fold enhanced editing efficiency and better genome stability. Our results demonstrate that asRNA-BE is a much better editing tool for base editing in <i>S. lividans</i> 66 and might be beneficial for improving the base editing efficiency and genome stability in other <i>Streptomyces</i> strains.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acssynbio.0c00563?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssynbio.0c00563</a>.Figures of SNP numbers of WT <i>S. lividans</i> 66 after seven generations, relative expression levels, and amino acid sequence alignments and tables of SNPs in SL_ΔUDG12, SL_ΔUDG12/BE2_redD, SL/asRNA-BE2_redD, and SL/BE2_redD compared to <i>S. lividans</i> 66, strains, plasmids, and primers used, and detailed information on antisense RNA strategy (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acssynbio.0c00563/suppl_file/sb0c00563_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
biochemical research methods
What problem does this paper attempt to address?