The added value of superb microvascular imaging for renal cortical thickness measurement in chronic kidney disease

Poemporn Limpisook,Pooriput Waongenngarm,Surachate Siripongsakun,Nannapat Nuangchamnong,Nutsurang Promrach,Thananya Thabsangthong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.23796
2024-08-30
Journal of Clinical Ultrasound
Abstract:The study found cutoff values for renal thickness (1.55 cm parenchymal, 0.65 cm cortical) to differentiate healthy individuals from those with chronic kidney disease. Using B‐mode ultrasound with SMI showed greater accuracy than B‐mode alone when compared to CT/MRI images, aiding in early detection and monitoring of CKD. Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate renal parenchymal thickness and renal cortical thickness measurements on brightness mode ultrasound (B‐mode US) and B‐mode US + Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) technique, comparing with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) serving as a reference standard. Methods Renal parenchymal thickness and renal cortical thickness measurements were obtained from B‐mode US, B‐mode US + SMI, and CT/MRI in a group of healthy subjects and a group of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The mean differences and correlations of renal parenchymal thickness and renal cortical thickness were analyzed using dependent pair t‐test and Pearson's correlation, respectively. Results The mean difference in renal cortical thickness measurements between B‐mode US + SMI and CT/MRI was lower than the mean difference between B‐mode US alone and CT/MRI. Additionally, renal cortical thickness measured using B‐mode US + SMI showed a stronger correlation with values obtained from CT/MRI than values measured using standard B‐mode US alone. Conclusion The measurement of renal cortical thickness by B‐mode US + SMI is more accurate than that by B‐mode US alone.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,acoustics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?