Abstract:Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become the standard of care for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis in individuals who are at prohibitive surgical risk and presents a viable alternative to surgery in selected patients who are at high operative risk. To date, outcomes from the PARTNER (Placement of AoRtic TraNscathetER Valve) and Medtronic CoreValve® US Pivotal trials continue to show the benefits of TAVR in these high-risk subgroups out to 5 and 3 years, respectively (as reported by Mack et al. Lancet. 85:2477-2484 2015; Kapadia et al. Lancet. 385:2485-2491 2015; Deeb et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 67:2565-2574 2016). Furthermore, the recent release of the PARTNER-2 and SURTAVI trial results among other international data suggest that clinical outcomes for intermediate risk patients may be promising for TAVR compared to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) (as reported by Leon et al. N Engl J Med. 374:1609-1620 2016; Reardon et al. N Engl J Med. 376:1321-1331 2017). However, several questions persist regarding TAVR-specific complications as well as long-term durability. Paravalvular regurgitation, permanent pacemaker implantation, stroke, vascular access injury, and renal failure in post-TAVR patients remain adversaries in the quest to perfect this groundbreaking, game-changing technology (as reported by Khatri et al. Ann Intern Med. 158:35-46 2013). In this review, we provide an up-to-date synopsis of results from landmark clinical trials that cumulatively attest to the comparability of TAVR to best medical therapy and SAVR in extreme-risk, high-risk, and intermediate-risk patient populations. We continue with a review of studies that seek to compare transcatheter vs. surgical valve implantation in lower-risk subgroups. We also introduce ongoing efforts to optimize the peri-procedural management of TAVR and conclude with a presentation of management strategies and new generation valve platforms that seek to address some of the current limitations of transcatheter valve implantation.

Enhancing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) outcomes through virtual proctoring: a case series analysis

The safety and feasibility of live-stream proctoring for CTO procedures

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): state of the art techniques and future perspectives

Patient-specific simulations of transcatheter aortic valve stent implantation

Simulation of transcatheter aortic valve implantation through patient-specific finite element analysis: Two clinical cases

Virtual support for remote proctoring in TAVR during COVID-19

Computed tomography to guide transcatheter aortic valve implantation

In silico approaches for transcatheter aortic valve replacement inspection

Challenges and future opportunities for transcatheter aortic valve therapy

Engineering perspective on transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Anaesthetic and Procedural-Related Complications in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) and Its Outcome: A Retrospective Observational Study

Transcatheter Heart Valve Implantation in Bicuspid Patients with Self-Expanding Device

Recent developments and controversies in transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Exploring Optimal Strategies for Surgical Access in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Complications in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A comprehensive analysis and management strategies

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Outcomes, Indications, Complications, and Innovations

Clinical considerations and challenges in TAV-in-TAV procedures

From Pre-Procedural Planning to Procedural Scenarios and Possible Complications

The best way to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: From standard to new approaches

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Past, present, and future

How to improve patient outcomes following TAVI in 2024? Recent advances